mirror of
https://github.com/Tria-plc/edr-platform.git
synced 2026-08-28 00:50:56 +00:00
fix(auth): resolve position-type permissions so GL staff can open clearance pages
This commit is contained in:
@@ -35,10 +35,57 @@ export class FreightMeService {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Permissions granted to the position's TYPE (`iam.position_type_permissions`).
|
||||
* A position type is the platform's notion of a role, and admin-created
|
||||
* positions carry their grants there rather than on the position itself — but
|
||||
* the JWT only ever snapshots direct position permissions. Without this, staff
|
||||
* on such a position resolve to zero permissions and every permission-gated
|
||||
* route rejects them (this is what locked GL officers out of their clearance
|
||||
* detail pages). Resolved live from IAM, same as the position type above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private async lookupPositionTypePermissions(
|
||||
positionId: string | undefined,
|
||||
): Promise<string[]> {
|
||||
if (!positionId) return [];
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const rows: { key: string }[] = await this.dataSource.query(
|
||||
`SELECT DISTINCT perm.key
|
||||
FROM iam.positions p
|
||||
JOIN iam.position_type_permissions ptp
|
||||
ON ptp.position_type_id = p.position_type_id
|
||||
JOIN iam.permissions perm ON perm.id = ptp.permission_id
|
||||
WHERE p.id = $1`,
|
||||
[positionId],
|
||||
);
|
||||
return rows.map((r) => r.key).filter(Boolean);
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
return []; // iam schema unreachable — degrade to position-only permissions
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async getEnrichedProfile(user: TCurrentUser) {
|
||||
const positionType = await this.lookupPositionType(
|
||||
user.employee?.position?.id,
|
||||
const positionId = user.employee?.position?.id;
|
||||
const [positionType, positionTypePermissionKeys] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
this.lookupPositionType(positionId),
|
||||
this.lookupPositionTypePermissions(positionId),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
// Merge the type-level grants into the position's own permission list so
|
||||
// BOTH consumers see them: `collectPermissionKeys` below, and the
|
||||
// backoffice's `getPermissionKeys`, which walks this same nested array.
|
||||
const positionPermissions = [
|
||||
...(user.employee?.position?.permissions ?? []),
|
||||
];
|
||||
const seenPermissionKeys = new Set(
|
||||
positionPermissions.map((p) => p?.key).filter(Boolean),
|
||||
);
|
||||
for (const key of positionTypePermissionKeys) {
|
||||
if (!seenPermissionKeys.has(key)) {
|
||||
seenPermissionKeys.add(key);
|
||||
positionPermissions.push({ key } as (typeof positionPermissions)[number]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const employee = user.employee
|
||||
? [
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +103,7 @@ export class FreightMeService {
|
||||
name: user.employee.position.name,
|
||||
isDelegate: user.employee.position.isDelegate,
|
||||
parentPositionId: user.employee.position.parentPositionId,
|
||||
permissions: user.employee.position.permissions ?? [],
|
||||
permissions: positionPermissions,
|
||||
positionType,
|
||||
},
|
||||
]
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +112,15 @@ export class FreightMeService {
|
||||
]
|
||||
: [];
|
||||
|
||||
const permissionKeys = collectPermissionKeys(user);
|
||||
// `collectPermissionKeys` reads the raw token (position-level only), so
|
||||
// union the type-level grants in — the backoffice prefers this flat list
|
||||
// over the nested array and would otherwise still see none of them.
|
||||
const permissionKeys = [
|
||||
...new Set([
|
||||
...collectPermissionKeys(user),
|
||||
...positionTypePermissionKeys,
|
||||
]),
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: user.id,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +90,21 @@ export class BookingInvoiceService {
|
||||
return this.billing.generateInvoice(input);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Cancel the booking's open PREPAID invoice, if any — used when a
|
||||
* changes-requested resubmit restates the cargo, so the re-priced booking can
|
||||
* be re-invoiced. Throws when the invoice already has payments recorded
|
||||
* (cargo must not change out from under recorded money).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
async cancelUnpaidInvoiceForBooking(bookingId: string): Promise<void> {
|
||||
const existing = await this.billing.findPayable(
|
||||
Freight.InvoiceSource.Booking,
|
||||
bookingId,
|
||||
"PREPAID",
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (existing) await this.billing.cancelInvoice(existing.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* React to a booking invoice being paid — the settlement branch point. Per-type
|
||||
* reactions live here (not in the payment process): each invoice type advances
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
import { ContractBookingService } from './contract-booking.service';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* OPERATION_CHANGES_REQUESTED resubmit with restated cargo. Operations can ask
|
||||
* for the cargo itself to change, so a completion payload that restates
|
||||
* containers must cancel the unpaid invoice, wipe the persisted cargo and
|
||||
* re-run the fresh-completion path (re-persist, re-price, re-invoice). A
|
||||
* payload without cargo keeps the day-only resubmit behavior.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
describe('ContractBookingService — changes-requested resubmit restating cargo', () => {
|
||||
const CONTRACT = {
|
||||
id: 'c-1',
|
||||
reference: 'CTR-1',
|
||||
contractKind: 'GENERAL',
|
||||
freightType: 'CONTAINER',
|
||||
tradeDirection: 'IMPORT',
|
||||
customsClearingEnabled: false,
|
||||
contractValidUntil: null,
|
||||
cargoScope: [],
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const bookingWithCargo = () => ({
|
||||
id: 'b-1',
|
||||
contractId: 'c-1',
|
||||
reference: 'BKG-1',
|
||||
status: 'OPERATION_CHANGES_REQUESTED',
|
||||
bookingContainers: [{ containerSize: '20FT', quantity: 4 }],
|
||||
cargoTotalWeightVgm: 80,
|
||||
originYardId: 'y-o',
|
||||
destinationYardId: 'y-d',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
function makeService() {
|
||||
const bookingsRepository = {
|
||||
findByIdWithFiles: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(bookingWithCargo()),
|
||||
deleteContainers: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
||||
update: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
||||
};
|
||||
const invoiceService = {
|
||||
cancelUnpaidInvoiceForBooking: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
||||
};
|
||||
const trainSchedulingService = {
|
||||
assertBookingWindowOpen: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
||||
};
|
||||
const contractsRepository = {
|
||||
findByIdWithRelations: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(CONTRACT),
|
||||
};
|
||||
const service = new ContractBookingService(
|
||||
contractsRepository as never,
|
||||
bookingsRepository as never,
|
||||
{} as never, // bookingPricingService
|
||||
{} as never, // consolidationService
|
||||
{} as never, // containerTypesService
|
||||
{} as never, // ruleEngineService
|
||||
{} as never, // milestoneService
|
||||
invoiceService as never,
|
||||
{} as never, // bookingNotifier
|
||||
{} as never, // dataSource
|
||||
trainSchedulingService as never,
|
||||
{} as never, // bookingBatchService
|
||||
{} as never, // bookingTransitionService
|
||||
);
|
||||
return { service, bookingsRepository, invoiceService };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Both paths dead-end into a downstream private assert we replace with a
|
||||
// sentinel — which path threw tells us which branch the resubmit took.
|
||||
const SENTINEL = new Error('reached-branch');
|
||||
|
||||
it('restated cargo cancels the invoice, wipes cargo and re-runs fresh completion', async () => {
|
||||
const { service, bookingsRepository, invoiceService } = makeService();
|
||||
// First gate inside the fresh-completion (!hasCargo) path.
|
||||
jest
|
||||
.spyOn(
|
||||
service as never as { assertWithinQuantityCap: () => Promise<void> },
|
||||
'assertWithinQuantityCap',
|
||||
)
|
||||
.mockRejectedValue(SENTINEL);
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
service.completeUnderContract('c-1', 'b-1', {
|
||||
scheduledDate: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
containers: [{ containerSize: '20FT', quantity: 2 }],
|
||||
} as never),
|
||||
).rejects.toBe(SENTINEL);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(invoiceService.cancelUnpaidInvoiceForBooking).toHaveBeenCalledWith('b-1');
|
||||
expect(bookingsRepository.deleteContainers).toHaveBeenCalledWith('b-1');
|
||||
expect(bookingsRepository.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith('b-1', {
|
||||
cargoTotalWeightVgm: 0,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('a day-only resubmit keeps the persisted cargo and invoice untouched', async () => {
|
||||
const { service, bookingsRepository, invoiceService } = makeService();
|
||||
// First call inside the day-only (hasCargo) resubmit path.
|
||||
jest
|
||||
.spyOn(
|
||||
service as never as {
|
||||
assertPersistedContainersAvailable: () => Promise<void>;
|
||||
},
|
||||
'assertPersistedContainersAvailable',
|
||||
)
|
||||
.mockRejectedValue(SENTINEL);
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
service.completeUnderContract('c-1', 'b-1', {
|
||||
scheduledDate: new Date().toISOString(),
|
||||
} as never),
|
||||
).rejects.toBe(SENTINEL);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(invoiceService.cancelUnpaidInvoiceForBooking).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
expect(bookingsRepository.deleteContainers).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -692,11 +692,30 @@ export class ContractBookingService {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const freightType = contract.freightType;
|
||||
const hasCargo =
|
||||
let hasCargo =
|
||||
(booking.bookingContainers?.length ?? 0) > 0 ||
|
||||
Number(booking.cargoTotalWeightVgm) > 0;
|
||||
const warnings: string[] = [];
|
||||
|
||||
// Operations may return a booking asking for the CARGO to change (fewer or
|
||||
// more containers), not just the day. A resubmit whose payload restates the
|
||||
// cargo therefore starts the completion over: cancel the unpaid invoice
|
||||
// first (it throws if money is already recorded — cargo must not change
|
||||
// under a paid invoice), then wipe the persisted cargo so the fresh-
|
||||
// completion path below re-persists, re-prices and re-invoices from the
|
||||
// payload. A resubmit without cargo keeps today's day-only behavior.
|
||||
const restatesCargo = Boolean(
|
||||
dto.containers?.length || dto.bulkLines?.length,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (hasCargo && restatesCargo) {
|
||||
await this.invoiceService.cancelUnpaidInvoiceForBooking(booking.id);
|
||||
await this.bookingsRepository.deleteContainers(booking.id);
|
||||
await this.bookingsRepository.update(booking.id, {
|
||||
cargoTotalWeightVgm: 0,
|
||||
} as never);
|
||||
hasCargo = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// EXPORT rides whole or not at all (no split concept): the chosen day must
|
||||
// have a single open train that carries the whole booking. First completion
|
||||
// sizes from the dto's cargo; a changes-requested resubmit (cargo already
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user