feat(train-sets): implement multi-locomotive support for train sets

- Added TrainSetLocomotive entity to link multiple locomotives to a train set.
- Updated TrainSet entity to include a OneToMany relationship with TrainSetLocomotive.
- Modified the train scheduling logic to require at least two locomotives for a train set.
- Enhanced the UI components to support selecting multiple locomotives.
- Introduced new permissions for viewing customs clearance.
- Updated migrations to create the train_set_locomotives table and backfill existing data.
- Implemented utility functions for managing train numbers based on cargo type and direction.
- Added tests for train number utilities to ensure correct functionality.
This commit is contained in:
Marshal
2026-06-24 23:54:45 +00:00
parent 15ab9f906e
commit e0c3044933
28 changed files with 817 additions and 118 deletions

View File

@@ -389,8 +389,12 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
isActive: true,
};
const locomotive2 = { ...locomotive, id: 'loc-2', code: 'LOC-002' };
const lockedLocomotiveRepo = {
findOne: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(locomotive),
findOne: jest
.fn()
.mockResolvedValueOnce(locomotive)
.mockResolvedValueOnce(locomotive2),
update: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
const trainScheduleRepo = {
@@ -401,6 +405,10 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
create: jest.fn().mockImplementation((value) => value),
save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: 'train-set-1' }),
};
const trainSetLocomotiveRepo = {
create: jest.fn().mockImplementation((value) => value),
save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
const manager = {
getRepository: jest.fn((entity: { name?: string }) => {
switch (entity?.name) {
@@ -410,13 +418,14 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
return trainScheduleRepo;
case 'TrainSet':
return trainSetRepo;
case 'TrainSetLocomotive':
return trainSetLocomotiveRepo;
default:
throw new Error(`Unexpected transaction repository ${entity?.name}`);
}
}),
};
jest.spyOn(service, 'selectOrValidateLocomotive').mockResolvedValue(locomotive as never);
dataSource.getRepository.mockImplementation((entity: unknown) => {
if ((entity as { name?: string })?.name === 'Route') {
return { findOne: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(route) };
@@ -437,12 +446,16 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
const result = await service.createContainerTrainSchedule({
routeId: 'route-1',
scheduleDate: '2026-06-20T08:00:00.000Z',
locomotiveId: 'loc-1',
locomotiveIds: ['loc-1', 'loc-2'],
});
expect(trainSetRepo.save).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(trainScheduleRepo.save).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(lockedLocomotiveRepo.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith('loc-1', { status: 'ASSIGNED' });
expect(trainSetLocomotiveRepo.save).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(lockedLocomotiveRepo.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
{ id: expect.objectContaining({ _type: 'in', _value: ['loc-1', 'loc-2'] }) },
{ status: 'ASSIGNED' },
);
expect(result.id).toBe('schedule-1');
});
@@ -508,7 +521,6 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
})),
};
jest.spyOn(service, 'selectOrValidateLocomotive').mockResolvedValue(locomotive as never);
dataSource.getRepository.mockImplementation((entity: { name?: string }) => {
if (entity?.name === 'Route') {
return {
@@ -531,7 +543,7 @@ describe('TrainSchedulingService', () => {
service.createContainerTrainSchedule({
routeId: 'route-1',
scheduleDate: '2026-06-20T08:00:00.000Z',
locomotiveId: 'loc-1',
locomotiveIds: ['loc-1', 'loc-2'],
}),
).rejects.toBeInstanceOf(ConflictException);
});