mirror of
https://github.com/Tria-plc/edr-platform.git
synced 2026-09-06 12:25:02 +00:00
feat: (upgrade) implement per-passenger fare class upgrade with configurable policies
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ import { SegmentFareSeeder } from "./seed/segment-fare.seeder";
|
||||
|
||||
import { EOtpType } from "@tria-plc/iamapi-common";
|
||||
import { RescheduleModule } from './modules/reschedule/reschedule.module';
|
||||
import { UpgradeModule } from './modules/upgrade/upgrade.module';
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [
|
||||
@@ -166,6 +167,7 @@ import { RescheduleModule } from './modules/reschedule/reschedule.module';
|
||||
AppReleasesModule,
|
||||
ConfigurableFareModule,
|
||||
RescheduleModule,
|
||||
UpgradeModule,
|
||||
],
|
||||
providers: [
|
||||
{ provide: APP_FILTER, useClass: DeleteExceptionFilter },
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ export const AUDIT_ENTITIES = {
|
||||
Booking: 'Booking',
|
||||
BookingReschedule: 'BookingReschedule',
|
||||
ReschedulePolicy: 'ReschedulePolicy',
|
||||
BookingUpgrade: 'BookingUpgrade',
|
||||
UpgradePolicy: 'UpgradePolicy',
|
||||
} as const;
|
||||
|
||||
export type AuditEntity = (typeof AUDIT_ENTITIES)[keyof typeof AUDIT_ENTITIES];
|
||||
|
||||
144
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/common/utils/booking-change.utils.ts
Normal file
144
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/common/utils/booking-change.utils.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
||||
import { ForbiddenException, NotFoundException } from '@nestjs/common';
|
||||
import { Prisma } from '@prisma/client';
|
||||
import { PrismaService } from '../prisma.service';
|
||||
import { MeLikeUser } from '../passenger-permission.util';
|
||||
import { normalizePhone, samePhone } from './phone.utils';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Shared by every flow that lets a passenger change a confirmed booking — reschedule today,
|
||||
* fare-class upgrade next. These were private to RescheduleService; they live here so the two
|
||||
* features cannot drift apart on who is allowed to act or how a seat is priced.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Plain functions rather than a provider on purpose: AuditService injects REQUEST, so anything
|
||||
* made injectable here would drag request scope into whatever consumes it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
export type ActingUser = MeLikeUser & { id?: string; sub?: string; phoneNumber?: string };
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The signed-in user's phone. The session snapshot (`userInfo.phoneNumber`) is frequently an
|
||||
* empty string, so `iam.users` is the source of truth — and reading it live also means a user
|
||||
* who changed their number does not have to sign out before the new one counts.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export async function resolveUserPhone(
|
||||
prisma: PrismaService,
|
||||
iamUserId: string,
|
||||
user: ActingUser,
|
||||
): Promise<string | null> {
|
||||
const fromSession = normalizePhone(user.phoneNumber);
|
||||
if (fromSession) return fromSession;
|
||||
const rows = await prisma.$queryRaw<{ phone_number: string | null }[]>`
|
||||
SELECT phone_number FROM iam.users WHERE id = ${iamUserId}::uuid LIMIT 1
|
||||
`;
|
||||
return normalizePhone(rows[0]?.phone_number);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Loads a booking only for the person who made it, proven by their account's phone number
|
||||
* matching the booking's `contactPhone`. Being merely *named* on the booking is not enough — a
|
||||
* passenger travelling on someone else's booking cannot change it.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* There is deliberately no staff override. `bookings:reschedule` exists in the registry (and on
|
||||
* the stationMaster preset) but is not honoured, so a station master cannot act on a customer's
|
||||
* behalf yet.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* `action` only shapes the error message ("reschedule it" / "upgrade it").
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export async function loadOwnedBooking<T extends Prisma.BookingInclude>(
|
||||
prisma: PrismaService,
|
||||
bookingRef: string,
|
||||
user: ActingUser,
|
||||
include: T,
|
||||
action = 'change it',
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const booking = await prisma.booking.findUnique({ where: { bookingRef }, include });
|
||||
if (!booking) throw new NotFoundException('Booking not found');
|
||||
const iamUserId = user.id ?? user.sub;
|
||||
if (!iamUserId) throw new ForbiddenException();
|
||||
|
||||
const b = booking as any;
|
||||
if (b.contactPhone) {
|
||||
const callerPhone = await resolveUserPhone(prisma, iamUserId, user);
|
||||
if (samePhone(callerPhone, b.contactPhone)) return booking;
|
||||
throw new ForbiddenException(
|
||||
`Only the person who made this booking can ${action}. Sign in with the phone number used to book.`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A small tail of bookings carry no contactPhone at all, so there is nothing to match against.
|
||||
// Fall back to the account link rather than locking their owner out entirely.
|
||||
const passenger = await prisma.passenger.findUnique({ where: { iamUserId }, select: { id: true } });
|
||||
if (!passenger || passenger.id !== b.passengerId) throw new ForbiddenException('Not your booking');
|
||||
return booking;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Coaches nobody buys a seat in, so they can never carry a fare-class policy.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Matched loosely on purpose: `CoachType.type` is documented as 'passenger' | 'sleeper' |
|
||||
* 'dining' | 'baggage', but the live data holds display labels ('Dining Coach ', trailing space
|
||||
* included). A `notIn: ['dining','baggage']` filter therefore matches nothing and offers the
|
||||
* dining coach as a fare class. Mirrors the portal's own test (`/dining|dpc/i`).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export const NON_FARE_COACH_TERMS = ['dining', 'dpc', 'baggage'];
|
||||
|
||||
export const NOT_A_FARE_CLASS = {
|
||||
NOT: NON_FARE_COACH_TERMS.flatMap((term) => [
|
||||
{ type: { contains: term, mode: 'insensitive' as const } },
|
||||
{ code: { contains: term, mode: 'insensitive' as const } },
|
||||
]),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/** True when this coach type is a dining/baggage coach rather than a sellable fare class. */
|
||||
export function isNonFareCoachType(coachType: { type?: string | null; code?: string | null }): boolean {
|
||||
const haystack = `${coachType.type ?? ''} ${coachType.code ?? ''}`.toLowerCase();
|
||||
return NON_FARE_COACH_TERMS.some((t) => haystack.includes(t));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Nationality is not stored on the booking, so the display currency is the proxy the search and
|
||||
* fare code already use: ETB/DJF are local tariffs, USD is the international one. Both flows must
|
||||
* use the same proxy or an upgrade would be priced on a different tariff than the original sale.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function resolveNationalityProxy(displayCurrency?: string | null): {
|
||||
nationalityType: 'LOCAL' | 'INTERNATIONAL';
|
||||
nationality: string | undefined;
|
||||
} {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
nationalityType: displayCurrency === 'USD' ? 'INTERNATIONAL' : 'LOCAL',
|
||||
nationality:
|
||||
displayCurrency === 'DJF' ? 'Djiboutian' : displayCurrency === 'ETB' ? 'Ethiopian' : undefined,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Mirrors SearchService's class matching: nationality filter, then bed position.
|
||||
* `Seat.bedPosition` is lowercase and `SeatClass.bedPosition` uppercase, hence the folding.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function pickSeatClass(classes: any[], bedPosition: string | null, nationalityType: string) {
|
||||
const byNat = classes.filter((c) => !c.nationalityType || c.nationalityType === nationalityType);
|
||||
const pool = byNat.length ? byNat : classes;
|
||||
const bed = bedPosition?.toLowerCase() ?? null;
|
||||
const exact = pool.find((c) => (c.bedPosition?.toLowerCase() ?? null) === bed);
|
||||
return exact ?? pool.find((c) => !c.bedPosition) ?? pool[0] ?? null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Distributes a leg fare over seats; free children (fare 0) stay 0 and rounding lands on the last
|
||||
* paid seat.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function splitFare(total: number, seats: Array<{ fareMinor: number | null }>): number[] {
|
||||
const paid = seats.map((s) => s.fareMinor !== 0);
|
||||
const n = paid.filter(Boolean).length || 1;
|
||||
const each = Math.floor(total / n);
|
||||
let remaining = total;
|
||||
let lastPaid = -1;
|
||||
const out = seats.map((_, i) => {
|
||||
if (!paid[i]) return 0;
|
||||
lastPaid = i;
|
||||
remaining -= each;
|
||||
return each;
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (lastPaid >= 0) out[lastPaid] += remaining;
|
||||
return out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -24,12 +24,25 @@ export const MIN_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES = 7;
|
||||
export const PAYMENT_SETTLE_MARGIN_SECONDS = 60;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* `windowMinutes` is how long the payer is given, and is configurable per flow
|
||||
* (`booking_payment_window_minutes`, `reschedule_…`, `upgrade_…` in SystemConfig). It defaults to
|
||||
* MAX_PAYMENT_HOURS so any caller that does not pass it behaves exactly as before.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The check-in cutoff is still the hard ceiling: a longer window can never let someone pay after
|
||||
* boarding has closed on their train.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* EVERY site that decides whether a booking is still payable — the payment link, the seat hold,
|
||||
* and the crons that auto-cancel unpaid bookings — must pass the SAME window for a given booking,
|
||||
* or a cron will cancel a booking whose link still says it is valid.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function computePaymentDeadline(
|
||||
createdAt: Date,
|
||||
departureAt: Date,
|
||||
checkinMinutes: number = CUTOFF_MINUTES,
|
||||
windowMinutes: number = MAX_PAYMENT_HOURS * 60,
|
||||
): Date {
|
||||
const maxDeadline = new Date(createdAt.getTime() + MAX_PAYMENT_HOURS * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
const maxDeadline = new Date(createdAt.getTime() + windowMinutes * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
const cutoffDeadline = new Date(departureAt.getTime() - checkinMinutes * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
return maxDeadline < cutoffDeadline ? maxDeadline : cutoffDeadline;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
import { SystemConfigModule } from '../system-config/system-config.module';
|
||||
import { Module } from '@nestjs/common';
|
||||
import { HttpModule } from '@nestjs/axios';
|
||||
import { AuditModule } from '../../common/audit.module';
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +15,7 @@ import { PaymentsModule } from '../payments/payments.module';
|
||||
import { NotificationsModule } from '../notifications/notifications.module';
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [AuditModule, SeatsModule, VerifaydaModule, CurrencyModule, FareEngineModule, HttpModule, AuthModule, TicketsModule, PaymentsModule, NotificationsModule],
|
||||
imports: [SystemConfigModule, AuditModule, SeatsModule, VerifaydaModule, CurrencyModule, FareEngineModule, HttpModule, AuthModule, TicketsModule, PaymentsModule, NotificationsModule],
|
||||
controllers: [BookingsController],
|
||||
providers: [BookingsService, GuestBookingService],
|
||||
exports: [BookingsService, GuestBookingService]
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import { assertIdentitiesNotAlreadyBooked, resolveIdentityRef } from './booking-
|
||||
import { Currency, PassengerCategory, IdDocumentType, PaymentMethodType, PaymentIntentStatus } from '@prisma/client';
|
||||
import { JourneyDirection } from '../seats/seats.dto';
|
||||
import { resolveCheckinCutoff } from '../../common/utils/checkin-cutoff.utils';
|
||||
import { CONFIG_KEYS, SystemConfigService } from '../system-config/system-config.service';
|
||||
import { computePaymentDeadline } from '../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils';
|
||||
import { randomUUID } from 'crypto';
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ export class GuestBookingService {
|
||||
private readonly logger = new Logger(GuestBookingService.name);
|
||||
|
||||
constructor(
|
||||
private systemConfig: SystemConfigService,
|
||||
private prisma: PrismaService,
|
||||
@InjectDataSource() private readonly dataSource: DataSource,
|
||||
private seatsService: SeatsService,
|
||||
@@ -582,7 +584,10 @@ export class GuestBookingService {
|
||||
const { guestPassengerId } = await this.resolveGuestPassenger({}, passengerData);
|
||||
|
||||
const payToken = isStaff ? undefined : randomUUID();
|
||||
const payTokenExpiresAt = isStaff ? undefined : computePaymentDeadline(new Date(), schedule.departureAt);
|
||||
const bookingWindowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
const payTokenExpiresAt = isStaff
|
||||
? undefined
|
||||
: computePaymentDeadline(new Date(), schedule.departureAt, undefined, bookingWindowMinutes);
|
||||
|
||||
const booking = await this.prisma.booking.create({
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -749,6 +749,26 @@ export class NotificationsService {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@OnEvent('booking.upgraded')
|
||||
async onBookingUpgraded(payload: any) {
|
||||
const { booking, upgrade } = payload;
|
||||
const items = Array.isArray(upgrade?.items) ? upgrade.items : [];
|
||||
await this.send(
|
||||
'booking.upgraded',
|
||||
booking.passengerId,
|
||||
{
|
||||
bookingRef: booking.bookingRef,
|
||||
leg: upgrade?.leg === 2 ? 'return' : 'outbound',
|
||||
passengerSummary: items.map((i: any) => i.passengerName).join(', '),
|
||||
amountPaid: (((upgrade?.feeMinor ?? 0) + Math.max(0, upgrade?.fareDifferenceMinor ?? 0)) / 100).toFixed(2),
|
||||
currency: 'ETB',
|
||||
category: 'BOOKING',
|
||||
deepLink: `edr://bookings/${booking.bookingRef}`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
['IN_APP', 'EMAIL', 'SMS'],
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@OnEvent('booking.cancelled')
|
||||
async onBookingCancelled(payload: any) {
|
||||
const booking = payload.booking;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
import { SystemConfigModule } from '../system-config/system-config.module';
|
||||
import { Module } from "@nestjs/common";
|
||||
import { HttpModule } from "@nestjs/axios";
|
||||
import { ConfigService } from "@nestjs/config";
|
||||
@@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ function rabbitMQImport(): DynamicModule[] {
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [
|
||||
SystemConfigModule,
|
||||
SeatsModule,
|
||||
TicketsModule,
|
||||
CurrencyModule,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
import { Test, TestingModule } from "@nestjs/testing";
|
||||
import { PaymentsService } from "./payments.service";
|
||||
import { SystemConfigService } from "../system-config/system-config.service";
|
||||
import { PaymentClientService } from "./payment-client.service";
|
||||
import { CurrencyService } from "../currency/currency.service";
|
||||
import { PrismaService } from "../../common/prisma.service";
|
||||
@@ -133,6 +134,8 @@ describe("PaymentsService", () => {
|
||||
{ provide: PaymentClientService, useValue: mockPaymentClient },
|
||||
{ provide: CurrencyService, useValue: mockCurrencyService },
|
||||
{ provide: AuditService, useValue: { log: jest.fn() } },
|
||||
// 120 = the default booking payment window; the deadline maths under test is unchanged by it.
|
||||
{ provide: SystemConfigService, useValue: { getNumber: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(120) } },
|
||||
],
|
||||
}).compile();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ import {
|
||||
MIN_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES,
|
||||
PAYMENT_SETTLE_MARGIN_SECONDS,
|
||||
} from "../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils";
|
||||
import { CONFIG_KEYS, SystemConfigService } from "../system-config/system-config.service";
|
||||
import {
|
||||
PaymentClientService,
|
||||
PaymentDiagnostic,
|
||||
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ export class PaymentsService {
|
||||
private readonly waafiDemoTrustReturn = true;
|
||||
|
||||
constructor(
|
||||
private systemConfig: SystemConfigService,
|
||||
private prisma: PrismaService,
|
||||
private seatsService: SeatsService,
|
||||
private ticketsService: TicketsService,
|
||||
@@ -748,7 +750,10 @@ export class PaymentsService {
|
||||
originRouteStop?.checkinMinutesBefore ??
|
||||
booking.schedule.route?.checkinMinutesBefore ??
|
||||
undefined;
|
||||
return computePaymentDeadline(booking.createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes);
|
||||
// Same window the auto-cancel cron uses, or the payer would be shown a deadline the cron
|
||||
// does not honour.
|
||||
const windowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
return computePaymentDeadline(booking.createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes, windowMinutes);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private resolveReturnUrls(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import { SeatsModule } from '../seats/seats.module';
|
||||
import { TicketsModule } from '../tickets/tickets.module';
|
||||
import { PaymentsModule } from '../payments/payments.module';
|
||||
import { CurrencyModule } from '../currency/currency.module';
|
||||
import { SystemConfigModule } from '../system-config/system-config.module';
|
||||
import { RescheduleController } from './reschedule.controller';
|
||||
import { RescheduleService, SUPPLEMENTARY_CHARGE_PAID_EVENT } from './reschedule.service';
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ export class RescheduleEventsListener {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [AuditModule, BookingsModule, SeatsModule, TicketsModule, PaymentsModule, CurrencyModule],
|
||||
imports: [AuditModule, BookingsModule, SeatsModule, TicketsModule, PaymentsModule, CurrencyModule, SystemConfigModule],
|
||||
controllers: [RescheduleController],
|
||||
providers: [RescheduleService, RescheduleEventsListener],
|
||||
exports: [RescheduleService],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ import { AuditService } from '../../common/audit.service';
|
||||
import { AUDIT_ACTIONS, AUDIT_ENTITIES } from '../../common/audit.actions';
|
||||
import { MeLikeUser } from '../../common/passenger-permission.util';
|
||||
import { computePaymentDeadline } from '../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils';
|
||||
import { CONFIG_KEYS, SystemConfigService } from '../system-config/system-config.service';
|
||||
import { normalizePhone, samePhone } from '../../common/utils/phone.utils';
|
||||
import { BookingsService } from '../bookings/bookings.service';
|
||||
import { SeatsService } from '../seats/seats.service';
|
||||
@@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ type LegView = {
|
||||
departureAt: Date;
|
||||
seats: Array<{ id: string; seatId: string; passengerName: string; fareMinor: number | null; passengerCategory: string }>;
|
||||
coachTypeId: string;
|
||||
/** Every distinct coach type on the leg. More than one means a partial upgrade happened. */
|
||||
coachTypeIds: string[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Seats are ordered by passenger name so getOptions(), quote() and create() all see the same
|
||||
@@ -109,6 +112,7 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
private currencyService: CurrencyService,
|
||||
private auditService: AuditService,
|
||||
private eventEmitter: EventEmitter2,
|
||||
private systemConfig: SystemConfigService,
|
||||
) {}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Policy admin ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -267,7 +271,8 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
|
||||
const requestedBy = user.id ?? user.sub ?? booking.passengerId;
|
||||
const newDeparture = q.newDepartureAt;
|
||||
const expiresAt = computePaymentDeadline(new Date(), newDeparture);
|
||||
const windowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.RESCHEDULE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
const expiresAt = computePaymentDeadline(new Date(), newDeparture, undefined, windowMinutes);
|
||||
|
||||
const reschedule = await this.prisma.bookingReschedule.create({
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
@@ -314,7 +319,8 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
where: { id: reschedule.id },
|
||||
data: { supplementaryChargeId: charge.id },
|
||||
});
|
||||
await this.seatsService.confirmSeats(dto.newSeatIds);
|
||||
// Same instant the charge carries, so the hold and the payment link die together.
|
||||
await this.seatsService.confirmSeats(dto.newSeatIds, new Date(), expiresAt);
|
||||
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: requestedBy,
|
||||
@@ -497,11 +503,11 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
.map((s) => ({ id: s.id, seatId: s.seatId, passengerName: s.passengerName, fareMinor: s.fareMinor, passengerCategory: s.passengerCategory, coachTypeId: s.seat?.coach?.coachTypeId }));
|
||||
const l1 = seatsOf(1);
|
||||
if (l1.length && booking.schedule) {
|
||||
legs.push({ leg: 1, scheduleId: booking.scheduleId, originStationId: booking.originStationId, destinationStationId: booking.destinationStationId, departureAt: booking.schedule.departureAt, seats: l1, coachTypeId: l1[0].coachTypeId });
|
||||
legs.push({ leg: 1, scheduleId: booking.scheduleId, originStationId: booking.originStationId, destinationStationId: booking.destinationStationId, departureAt: booking.schedule.departureAt, seats: l1, coachTypeId: l1[0].coachTypeId, coachTypeIds: [...new Set(l1.map((s) => s.coachTypeId))] });
|
||||
}
|
||||
const l2 = seatsOf(2);
|
||||
if (booking.bookingType === 'ROUND_TRIP' && l2.length && booking.returnSchedule) {
|
||||
legs.push({ leg: 2, scheduleId: booking.returnScheduleId, originStationId: booking.returnOriginStationId, destinationStationId: booking.returnDestinationStationId, departureAt: booking.returnSchedule.departureAt, seats: l2, coachTypeId: l2[0].coachTypeId });
|
||||
legs.push({ leg: 2, scheduleId: booking.returnScheduleId, originStationId: booking.returnOriginStationId, destinationStationId: booking.returnDestinationStationId, departureAt: booking.returnSchedule.departureAt, seats: l2, coachTypeId: l2[0].coachTypeId, coachTypeIds: [...new Set(l2.map((s) => s.coachTypeId))] });
|
||||
}
|
||||
return legs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -521,6 +527,13 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
// round trip whose outbound was already used can't change its return yet — needs leg-scoped
|
||||
// ticket regeneration.
|
||||
if (booking.outboundBoardedAt || booking.returnBoardedAt) blockers.push('This booking has already been used for travel.');
|
||||
// A partial fare-class upgrade can leave one leg spanning two coach types. Everything below
|
||||
// — the policy lookup, the fee, the seat map — keys off a single leg-wide class taken from
|
||||
// the first seat, so a mixed leg would silently reschedule at the wrong class and price.
|
||||
// Refuse it outright until reschedule is made class-aware per passenger.
|
||||
if (leg.coachTypeIds.length > 1) {
|
||||
blockers.push('This booking has passengers in different fare classes. Please contact support to change it.');
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!policy || !policy.isActive) blockers.push('Rescheduling is not available for this fare class.');
|
||||
else if (leg.departureAt.getTime() - now.getTime() < policy.cutoffMinutes * 60_000) {
|
||||
blockers.push(`Changes must be made at least ${policy.cutoffMinutes} minutes before departure.`);
|
||||
@@ -537,6 +550,10 @@ export class RescheduleService {
|
||||
|
||||
const pending = await this.prisma.bookingReschedule.findFirst({ where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' } });
|
||||
if (pending) blockers.push('A reschedule is already awaiting payment for this booking.');
|
||||
// One change at a time. Two live supplementary charges would both drive ticket regeneration
|
||||
// on this booking and interleave unpredictably once each is paid.
|
||||
const pendingUpgrade = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findFirst({ where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' } });
|
||||
if (pendingUpgrade) blockers.push('An upgrade is awaiting payment for this booking — finish or cancel it first.');
|
||||
if (dto.newSeatIds.length !== leg.seats.length) blockers.push(`Select exactly ${leg.seats.length} seat(s).`);
|
||||
if (new Set(dto.newSeatIds).size !== dto.newSeatIds.length) blockers.push('Duplicate seats selected.');
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -701,7 +701,14 @@ export class SeatsService {
|
||||
// short seat-selection hold (5 min by default). Without this, the hold could expire
|
||||
// while the customer was still on the payment page, and a second customer could
|
||||
// hold/book the exact same seat out from under them.
|
||||
async confirmSeats(seatIds: string[], now: Date = new Date()): Promise<void> {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* `deadlineOverride` pins the hold to a deadline the caller has already computed. The
|
||||
* reschedule and upgrade flows pass the exact value their supplementary charge carries — if
|
||||
* this recomputed it instead, a per-flow payment window would give the hold and the payment
|
||||
* link different lifetimes and the seat could lapse while the link still worked.
|
||||
* Without it, the booking payment window is used, as before.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
async confirmSeats(seatIds: string[], now: Date = new Date(), deadlineOverride?: Date): Promise<void> {
|
||||
if (seatIds.length === 0) return;
|
||||
|
||||
const holds = await this.prisma.seatHold.findMany({
|
||||
@@ -717,12 +724,16 @@ export class SeatsService {
|
||||
});
|
||||
const departureById = new Map(schedules.map(s => [s.id, s.departureAt]));
|
||||
|
||||
const windowMinutes = deadlineOverride
|
||||
? 0 // unused — the override wins below
|
||||
: await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
|
||||
let extended = 0;
|
||||
await Promise.all(
|
||||
holds.map(async (hold) => {
|
||||
const departureAt = departureById.get(hold.scheduleId);
|
||||
if (!departureAt) return;
|
||||
const deadline = computePaymentDeadline(now, departureAt);
|
||||
const deadline = deadlineOverride ?? computePaymentDeadline(now, departureAt, undefined, windowMinutes);
|
||||
// Only ever extend forward — never shorten a hold that's already valid longer
|
||||
// than the payment deadline would give it (e.g. a second confirmSeats call on
|
||||
// the same booking, or a hold that was already extended).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
|
||||
import { IsInt, IsOptional, Min, Max } from 'class-validator';
|
||||
import { Type } from 'class-transformer';
|
||||
import { ApiPropertyOptional } from '@nestjs/swagger';
|
||||
import { MIN_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES } from '../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Whitelisted, typed body for `PATCH /config`. Config is persisted as string key/values, but every
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +23,23 @@ export class UpdateSystemConfigDto {
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0)
|
||||
boarding_window_hours_before_departure?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
// Payment windows, in minutes. Floored at MIN_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES (7) because canOpenPaymentSession
|
||||
// refuses to open a provider session with less than that left — a window below it makes every
|
||||
// card/HPP payment impossible to start. Capped at 1440 (24h) — the check-in cutoff already bounds the
|
||||
// effective deadline, but a stray 100000 would make the auto-cancel pre-filter scan pointlessly
|
||||
// far back.
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 120, description: 'Minutes a new booking has to be paid (7..1440)' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0) @Max(1440)
|
||||
booking_payment_window_minutes?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 120, description: 'Minutes a reschedule charge has to be paid (7..1440)' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0) @Max(1440)
|
||||
reschedule_payment_window_minutes?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 120, description: 'Minutes a fare upgrade has to be paid (7..1440)' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0) @Max(1440)
|
||||
upgrade_payment_window_minutes?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 5 })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(1)
|
||||
throttle_auth_limit?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,12 @@ export const CONFIG_KEYS = {
|
||||
SEAT_HOLD_DURATION_MINUTES: 'seat_hold_duration_minutes',
|
||||
HOLD_CUTOFF_HOURS_BEFORE_DEPARTURE: 'hold_cutoff_hours_before_departure',
|
||||
BOARDING_WINDOW_HOURS_BEFORE_DEPARTURE: 'boarding_window_hours_before_departure',
|
||||
// How long a passenger has to pay, per flow. The effective deadline is always
|
||||
// MIN(now + window, departure - check-in cutoff) — a longer window can never let someone pay
|
||||
// after boarding closes.
|
||||
BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES: 'booking_payment_window_minutes',
|
||||
RESCHEDULE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES: 'reschedule_payment_window_minutes',
|
||||
UPGRADE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES: 'upgrade_payment_window_minutes',
|
||||
THROTTLE_AUTH_LIMIT: 'throttle_auth_limit',
|
||||
THROTTLE_AUTH_TTL_MS: 'throttle_auth_ttl_ms',
|
||||
THROTTLE_STRICT_LIMIT: 'throttle_strict_limit',
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +23,10 @@ const DEFAULTS: Record<string, string> = {
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.SEAT_HOLD_DURATION_MINUTES]: '5',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.HOLD_CUTOFF_HOURS_BEFORE_DEPARTURE]: '2',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.BOARDING_WINDOW_HOURS_BEFORE_DEPARTURE]: '4',
|
||||
// 120 = the 2 hours these flows used before the window became configurable.
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES]: '120',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.RESCHEDULE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES]: '120',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.UPGRADE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES]: '120',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.THROTTLE_AUTH_LIMIT]: '5',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.THROTTLE_AUTH_TTL_MS]: '60000',
|
||||
[CONFIG_KEYS.THROTTLE_STRICT_LIMIT]: '20',
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@ import { PrismaModule } from '../../common/prisma.module';
|
||||
import { NotificationsModule } from '../notifications/notifications.module';
|
||||
import { CurrencyModule } from '../currency/currency.module';
|
||||
import { PaymentsModule } from '../payments/payments.module';
|
||||
import { SystemConfigModule } from '../system-config/system-config.module';
|
||||
import { TasksService } from './tasks.service';
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [PrismaModule, NotificationsModule, CurrencyModule, PaymentsModule],
|
||||
imports: [PrismaModule, NotificationsModule, CurrencyModule, PaymentsModule, SystemConfigModule],
|
||||
providers: [TasksService],
|
||||
})
|
||||
export class TasksModule {}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ import { SmsClientService } from '../notifications/sms-client.service';
|
||||
import { CurrencyService } from '../currency/currency.service';
|
||||
import { PaymentsService } from '../payments/payments.service';
|
||||
import { RescheduleService } from '../reschedule/reschedule.service';
|
||||
import { UpgradeService } from '../upgrade/upgrade.service';
|
||||
import { CONFIG_KEYS, SystemConfigService } from '../system-config/system-config.service';
|
||||
import { MAX_PAYMENT_HOURS, CUTOFF_MINUTES, computePaymentDeadline } from '../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils';
|
||||
|
||||
// Retention windows
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +46,8 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
// REQUEST), and injecting a request-scoped provider here would make TasksService request-scoped
|
||||
// too — which silently stops all its @Cron methods from firing. Resolve it per-tick instead.
|
||||
private readonly moduleRef: ModuleRef,
|
||||
// Singleton (only injects Prisma), so it does not drag request scope in and silence the crons.
|
||||
private readonly systemConfig: SystemConfigService,
|
||||
) {}
|
||||
|
||||
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -177,6 +181,7 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Send reminder at the midpoint of each booking's payment window ────────
|
||||
private async sendPaymentReminders(now: Date) {
|
||||
const bookingWindowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
// Only look at bookings created within the last 3 h with a future departure.
|
||||
const threeHoursAgo = new Date(now.getTime() - 3 * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
);
|
||||
const checkinMinutes = originRouteStop?.checkinMinutesBefore ?? (booking.schedule as any).route?.checkinMinutesBefore ?? 30;
|
||||
if (dep <= now) continue; // segment has already departed; cancel job handles clean-up
|
||||
const paymentDeadline = computePaymentDeadline(createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes);
|
||||
const paymentDeadline = computePaymentDeadline(createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes, bookingWindowMinutes);
|
||||
const totalWindowMs = paymentDeadline.getTime() - createdAt.getTime();
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip degenerate windows (< 2 min) — the cancel job will handle these immediately
|
||||
@@ -260,7 +265,10 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Cancel bookings whose payment deadline has passed ─────────────────────
|
||||
private async cancelExpiredPendingBookings(now: Date) {
|
||||
const twoHoursAgo = new Date(now.getTime() - MAX_PAYMENT_HOURS * 60 * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
// Must be the SAME window the payment link was issued with, or a shortened window would
|
||||
// leave older bookings unselected by the pre-filter and never auto-cancelled.
|
||||
const bookingWindowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.BOOKING_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
const windowAgo = new Date(now.getTime() - bookingWindowMinutes * 60 * 1000);
|
||||
|
||||
// The departure pre-filter below is a query-scoping optimization only — the real
|
||||
// deadline check happens per-row further down. It must be widened to the largest
|
||||
@@ -286,7 +294,7 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
where: {
|
||||
status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT',
|
||||
OR: [
|
||||
{ createdAt: { lte: twoHoursAgo } },
|
||||
{ createdAt: { lte: windowAgo } },
|
||||
{ schedule: { departureAt: { lte: departureCutoff } } },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
@@ -329,7 +337,7 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
(s: any) => s.stationId === (booking as any).originStationId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const checkinMinutes = originRouteStop?.checkinMinutesBefore ?? (booking.schedule as any).route?.checkinMinutesBefore ?? CUTOFF_MINUTES;
|
||||
const paymentDeadline = computePaymentDeadline(createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes);
|
||||
const paymentDeadline = computePaymentDeadline(createdAt, dep, checkinMinutes, bookingWindowMinutes);
|
||||
if (now < paymentDeadline) continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// Deadline passed — but NEVER cancel a booking that is actually paid. The payment.succeeded
|
||||
@@ -526,6 +534,22 @@ export class TasksService {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// Every 1 min: fare-class upgrades whose payment deadline passed → EXPIRED.
|
||||
// Separate from the reschedule sweep on purpose — a failure in one must not
|
||||
// skip the other.
|
||||
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
@Cron('*/1 * * * *')
|
||||
async expireStaleUpgrades() {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const upgrade = await this.moduleRef.resolve(UpgradeService, undefined, { strict: false });
|
||||
const n = await upgrade.expireStale();
|
||||
if (n > 0) this.logger.log(`Expired ${n} unpaid upgrade request(s)`);
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
this.logger.error(`expireStaleUpgrades failed: ${err instanceof Error ? err.message : err}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Cron('0 2 * * *')
|
||||
async purgeExpiredData() {
|
||||
const now = new Date();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
|
||||
import { Body, Controller, Delete, Get, Param, Patch, Post, Req, UseGuards } from '@nestjs/common';
|
||||
import { ApiBearerAuth, ApiOperation, ApiTags } from '@nestjs/swagger';
|
||||
import { JwtGuard } from '../../common/jwt.guard';
|
||||
import { PassengerAdmin, PassengerStaff } from '../../common/passenger-guards';
|
||||
import { PASSENGER_PERMS } from '../../seed/passenger-permissions.registry';
|
||||
import { UpgradeService } from './upgrade.service';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
CreateUpgradeDto,
|
||||
CreateUpgradePolicyDto,
|
||||
UpgradeHoldDto,
|
||||
UpgradeQuoteDto,
|
||||
UpdateUpgradePolicyDto,
|
||||
} from './upgrade.dto';
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiTags('Fare upgrade')
|
||||
@Controller()
|
||||
export class UpgradeController {
|
||||
constructor(private service: UpgradeService) {}
|
||||
|
||||
@Get('upgrade/policies')
|
||||
@PassengerStaff(PASSENGER_PERMS.bookings.view)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Every upgrade policy, each with its coach type (fare class)' })
|
||||
listPolicies() {
|
||||
return this.service.listPolicies();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Get('upgrade/policies/available-coach-types')
|
||||
@PassengerStaff(PASSENGER_PERMS.bookings.view)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Coach types that do not have an upgrade policy yet (add-dialog dropdown)' })
|
||||
listUnconfiguredCoachTypes() {
|
||||
return this.service.listUnconfiguredCoachTypes();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Post('upgrade/policies')
|
||||
@PassengerAdmin()
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Create an upgrade policy for a coach type (admin)' })
|
||||
createPolicy(@Req() req: any, @Body() dto: CreateUpgradePolicyDto) {
|
||||
return this.service.createPolicy(dto, req.user?.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Patch('upgrade/policies/:coachTypeId')
|
||||
@PassengerAdmin()
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Update the upgrade policy of a coach type (admin)' })
|
||||
updatePolicy(@Req() req: any, @Param('coachTypeId') coachTypeId: string, @Body() dto: UpdateUpgradePolicyDto) {
|
||||
return this.service.updatePolicy(coachTypeId, dto, req.user?.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Delete('upgrade/policies/:coachTypeId')
|
||||
@PassengerAdmin()
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Delete an upgrade policy — the class can then be neither left nor entered (admin)' })
|
||||
deletePolicy(@Req() req: any, @Param('coachTypeId') coachTypeId: string) {
|
||||
return this.service.deletePolicy(coachTypeId, req.user?.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Get('bookings/:bookingRef/upgrade')
|
||||
@UseGuards(JwtGuard)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Per-leg upgrade eligibility, per-passenger targets, pending request and history' })
|
||||
options(@Req() req: any, @Param('bookingRef') bookingRef: string) {
|
||||
return this.service.getOptions(bookingRef, req.user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Post('bookings/:bookingRef/upgrade/quote')
|
||||
@UseGuards(JwtGuard)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Price an upgrade without committing to it' })
|
||||
quote(@Req() req: any, @Param('bookingRef') bookingRef: string, @Body() dto: UpgradeQuoteDto) {
|
||||
return this.service.quote(bookingRef, dto, req.user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Post('bookings/:bookingRef/upgrade/hold')
|
||||
@UseGuards(JwtGuard)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Hold the chosen seats, clearing abandoned attempts on this booking first' })
|
||||
hold(@Req() req: any, @Param('bookingRef') bookingRef: string, @Body() dto: UpgradeHoldDto) {
|
||||
return this.service.holdForUpgrade(bookingRef, dto, req.user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Post('bookings/:bookingRef/upgrade')
|
||||
@UseGuards(JwtGuard)
|
||||
@ApiBearerAuth('JWT-auth')
|
||||
@ApiOperation({ summary: 'Request an upgrade; returns a payment token when money is owed' })
|
||||
create(@Req() req: any, @Param('bookingRef') bookingRef: string, @Body() dto: CreateUpgradeDto) {
|
||||
return this.service.create(bookingRef, dto, req.user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
94
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.dto.ts
Normal file
94
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.dto.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
|
||||
import { ApiProperty, ApiPropertyOptional } from '@nestjs/swagger';
|
||||
import { Type } from 'class-transformer';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ArrayMinSize,
|
||||
IsArray,
|
||||
IsBoolean,
|
||||
IsInt,
|
||||
IsOptional,
|
||||
IsString,
|
||||
Max,
|
||||
Min,
|
||||
ValidateNested,
|
||||
} from 'class-validator';
|
||||
|
||||
export class UpdateUpgradePolicyDto {
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 2, description: 'Ladder position — an upgrade needs a strictly higher rank' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0)
|
||||
rank?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 0, description: '% of the passenger\'s original fare charged as a change fee' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0) @Max(100)
|
||||
feePercent?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 0, description: 'Fee floor in ETB minor units (500 ETB = 50000)' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(0)
|
||||
feeMinMinor?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: true, description: 'Waive the change fee entirely (policy US-17 §5)' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @IsBoolean()
|
||||
feeWaived?: boolean;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: true, description: 'Passengers may upgrade OUT of this class' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @IsBoolean()
|
||||
isUpgradable?: boolean;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: true, description: 'Passengers may upgrade INTO this class' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @IsBoolean()
|
||||
isTargetable?: boolean;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: true })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @IsBoolean()
|
||||
isActive?: boolean;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export class CreateUpgradePolicyDto extends UpdateUpgradePolicyDto {
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ example: 'coach-type-uuid', description: 'CoachType this policy applies to (one per fare class)' })
|
||||
@IsString()
|
||||
coachTypeId: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export class UpgradeItemDto {
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ example: 'booking-seat-uuid', description: 'The BookingSeat row being upgraded' })
|
||||
@IsString()
|
||||
bookingSeatId: string;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ example: 'seat-uuid', description: 'Seat this passenger moves to, in the target coach type' })
|
||||
@IsString()
|
||||
newSeatId: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export class UpgradeQuoteDto {
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 1, description: '1 = outbound (default), 2 = return leg of a round trip' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(1) @Max(2)
|
||||
leg?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ example: 'coach-type-uuid', description: 'Fare class every listed passenger is moving to' })
|
||||
@IsString()
|
||||
newCoachTypeId: string;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiProperty({
|
||||
type: [UpgradeItemDto],
|
||||
description:
|
||||
'One entry per upgrading passenger. Keyed on bookingSeatId, not array position — only some ' +
|
||||
'passengers move, so a positional pairing would be ambiguous.',
|
||||
})
|
||||
@IsArray() @ArrayMinSize(1) @ValidateNested({ each: true }) @Type(() => UpgradeItemDto)
|
||||
items: UpgradeItemDto[];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export class UpgradeHoldDto {
|
||||
@ApiPropertyOptional({ example: 1, description: '1 = outbound (default), 2 = return leg' })
|
||||
@IsOptional() @Type(() => Number) @IsInt() @Min(1) @Max(2)
|
||||
leg?: number;
|
||||
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ type: [String], description: 'Seats to hold, in the target coach type' })
|
||||
@IsArray() @ArrayMinSize(1) @IsString({ each: true })
|
||||
seatIds: string[];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export class CreateUpgradeDto extends UpgradeQuoteDto {
|
||||
@ApiProperty({ example: 'seat-hold-uuid', description: 'Hold covering every newSeatId' })
|
||||
@IsString()
|
||||
holdId: string;
|
||||
}
|
||||
46
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.module.ts
Normal file
46
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.module.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
import { Injectable, Logger, Module } from '@nestjs/common';
|
||||
import { ModuleRef } from '@nestjs/core';
|
||||
import { OnEvent } from '@nestjs/event-emitter';
|
||||
import { AuditModule } from '../../common/audit.module';
|
||||
import { BookingsModule } from '../bookings/bookings.module';
|
||||
import { SeatsModule } from '../seats/seats.module';
|
||||
import { SegmentsModule } from '../segments/segments.module';
|
||||
import { TicketsModule } from '../tickets/tickets.module';
|
||||
import { PaymentsModule } from '../payments/payments.module';
|
||||
import { CurrencyModule } from '../currency/currency.module';
|
||||
import { SystemConfigModule } from '../system-config/system-config.module';
|
||||
import { SUPPLEMENTARY_CHARGE_PAID_EVENT } from '../reschedule/reschedule.service';
|
||||
import { UpgradeController } from './upgrade.controller';
|
||||
import { UpgradeService } from './upgrade.service';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Same shape and same reason as RescheduleEventsListener: UpgradeService is request-scoped by
|
||||
* transitivity (AuditService injects REQUEST), and Nest never fires @OnEvent on request-scoped
|
||||
* providers — so the listener is a singleton that resolves the service per event.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Two listeners on one event is fine: each looks its charge up by its own unique
|
||||
* `supplementaryChargeId` and returns silently when the charge is not theirs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Injectable()
|
||||
export class UpgradeEventsListener {
|
||||
private readonly logger = new Logger(UpgradeEventsListener.name);
|
||||
constructor(private readonly moduleRef: ModuleRef) {}
|
||||
|
||||
@OnEvent(SUPPLEMENTARY_CHARGE_PAID_EVENT, { async: true })
|
||||
async onChargePaid(payload: { chargeId: string }) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const service = await this.moduleRef.resolve(UpgradeService, undefined, { strict: false });
|
||||
await service.applyForCharge(payload.chargeId);
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
this.logger.error(`Failed to apply upgrade for charge ${payload.chargeId}: ${err instanceof Error ? err.message : err}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Module({
|
||||
imports: [AuditModule, BookingsModule, SeatsModule, SegmentsModule, TicketsModule, PaymentsModule, CurrencyModule, SystemConfigModule],
|
||||
controllers: [UpgradeController],
|
||||
providers: [UpgradeService, UpgradeEventsListener],
|
||||
exports: [UpgradeService],
|
||||
})
|
||||
export class UpgradeModule {}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
import { computeUpgradeAmounts } from './upgrade.service';
|
||||
|
||||
// Pure arithmetic only, mirroring reschedule.service.spec.ts — no Nest test module, no mocks.
|
||||
describe('computeUpgradeAmounts', () => {
|
||||
const free = { feePercent: 0, feeMinMinor: 0, feeWaived: false };
|
||||
const waived = { feePercent: 30, feeMinMinor: 50000, feeWaived: true };
|
||||
const percentOnly = { feePercent: 10, feeMinMinor: 0, feeWaived: false };
|
||||
const flooredFee = { feePercent: 10, feeMinMinor: 50000, feeWaived: false };
|
||||
|
||||
it('charges only the fare difference when the class has no fee', () => {
|
||||
// RS 1752.34 → EBC 2336.46, as seeded on dev
|
||||
expect(computeUpgradeAmounts(free, 175234, 233646)).toEqual({
|
||||
feeMinor: 0,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: 58412,
|
||||
amountDueMinor: 58412,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('ignores a configured fee when the policy waives it (US-17 §5)', () => {
|
||||
expect(computeUpgradeAmounts(waived, 175234, 233646)).toEqual({
|
||||
feeMinor: 0,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: 58412,
|
||||
amountDueMinor: 58412,
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('takes the fee as a percentage of the ORIGINAL fare, not of the difference', () => {
|
||||
const r = computeUpgradeAmounts(percentOnly, 175234, 233646);
|
||||
expect(r.feeMinor).toBe(17523); // 10% of 175234, not of 58412
|
||||
expect(r.amountDueMinor).toBe(17523 + 58412);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('applies the fee floor when the percentage falls below it', () => {
|
||||
const r = computeUpgradeAmounts(flooredFee, 100000, 150000);
|
||||
expect(r.feeMinor).toBe(50000); // max(10% of 100000 = 10000, floor 50000)
|
||||
expect(r.amountDueMinor).toBe(100000);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('never lets a negative difference reduce the amount due', () => {
|
||||
// Refused upstream, but the arithmetic must not produce a credit if it ever gets here.
|
||||
const r = computeUpgradeAmounts(percentOnly, 200000, 150000);
|
||||
expect(r.fareDifferenceMinor).toBe(-50000);
|
||||
expect(r.amountDueMinor).toBe(r.feeMinor);
|
||||
expect(r.amountDueMinor).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('charges the full target fare for a free child', () => {
|
||||
const r = computeUpgradeAmounts(free, 0, 233646);
|
||||
expect(r.feeMinor).toBe(0); // a percentage of zero is zero
|
||||
expect(r.amountDueMinor).toBe(233646);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
859
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.service.ts
Normal file
859
apps/edr-passenger-api/src/modules/upgrade/upgrade.service.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,859 @@
|
||||
import {
|
||||
BadRequestException,
|
||||
ConflictException,
|
||||
Injectable,
|
||||
Logger,
|
||||
NotFoundException,
|
||||
} from '@nestjs/common';
|
||||
import { EventEmitter2 } from '@nestjs/event-emitter';
|
||||
import { Prisma } from '@prisma/client';
|
||||
import { PrismaService } from '../../common/prisma.service';
|
||||
import { AuditService } from '../../common/audit.service';
|
||||
import { AUDIT_ACTIONS, AUDIT_ENTITIES } from '../../common/audit.actions';
|
||||
import { computePaymentDeadline } from '../../common/utils/payment-deadline.utils';
|
||||
import { CONFIG_KEYS, SystemConfigService } from '../system-config/system-config.service';
|
||||
import { resolveCheckinCutoff } from '../../common/utils/checkin-cutoff.utils';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ActingUser,
|
||||
isNonFareCoachType,
|
||||
loadOwnedBooking,
|
||||
NOT_A_FARE_CLASS,
|
||||
pickSeatClass,
|
||||
resolveNationalityProxy,
|
||||
} from '../../common/utils/booking-change.utils';
|
||||
import { BookingsService } from '../bookings/bookings.service';
|
||||
import { SeatsService } from '../seats/seats.service';
|
||||
import { SegmentsService } from '../segments/segments.service';
|
||||
import { TicketsService } from '../tickets/tickets.service';
|
||||
import { PaymentsService } from '../payments/payments.service';
|
||||
import { SupplementaryChargesService } from '../payments/supplementary-charges.service';
|
||||
import { CurrencyService } from '../currency/currency.service';
|
||||
import { JourneyDirection } from '../seats/seats.dto';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
CreateUpgradeDto,
|
||||
CreateUpgradePolicyDto,
|
||||
UpgradeHoldDto,
|
||||
UpgradeQuoteDto,
|
||||
UpdateUpgradePolicyDto,
|
||||
} from './upgrade.dto';
|
||||
|
||||
export const UPGRADE_CHARGE_REASON = 'UPGRADE';
|
||||
|
||||
type PolicyFee = { feePercent: number; feeMinMinor: number; feeWaived: boolean };
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Pure fee arithmetic for one upgrading passenger — policy US-17. The fee is read from the class
|
||||
* being upgraded TO (§5 waives it for the premium classes), and is a percentage of that
|
||||
* passenger's ORIGINAL fare, not of the difference.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A non-positive difference never produces a credit: an upgrade that prices below the current
|
||||
* seat is refused upstream rather than refunded here (see `buildQuote`).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function computeUpgradeAmounts(
|
||||
policy: PolicyFee,
|
||||
oldFareMinor: number,
|
||||
newFareMinor: number,
|
||||
): { feeMinor: number; fareDifferenceMinor: number; amountDueMinor: number } {
|
||||
const feeMinor = policy.feeWaived
|
||||
? 0
|
||||
: policy.feePercent > 0 || policy.feeMinMinor > 0
|
||||
? Math.max(Math.round((oldFareMinor * policy.feePercent) / 100), policy.feeMinMinor)
|
||||
: 0;
|
||||
const fareDifferenceMinor = newFareMinor - oldFareMinor;
|
||||
return { feeMinor, fareDifferenceMinor, amountDueMinor: feeMinor + Math.max(0, fareDifferenceMinor) };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type UpgradeItem = {
|
||||
bookingSeatId: string;
|
||||
passengerName: string;
|
||||
passengerCategory: string;
|
||||
oldSeatId: string;
|
||||
oldSeatLabel: string | null;
|
||||
oldCoachTypeId: string;
|
||||
oldSeatClassId: string | null;
|
||||
oldFareMinor: number;
|
||||
newSeatId: string;
|
||||
newSeatLabel: string | null;
|
||||
newCoachTypeId: string;
|
||||
newSeatClassId: string | null;
|
||||
newFareMinor: number;
|
||||
feeMinor: number;
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: number;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Seats ordered the same way the reschedule flow orders them, so both features present a leg's
|
||||
// passengers in one stable sequence. Upgrade itself keys on bookingSeatId, not position.
|
||||
const bookingInclude = {
|
||||
schedule: {
|
||||
select: {
|
||||
id: true, departureAt: true, arrivalAt: true, status: true,
|
||||
originStationId: true, destinationStationId: true,
|
||||
route: { select: { checkinMinutesBefore: true, stops: { select: { stationId: true, checkinMinutesBefore: true } } } },
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
returnSchedule: {
|
||||
select: {
|
||||
id: true, departureAt: true, arrivalAt: true, status: true,
|
||||
originStationId: true, destinationStationId: true,
|
||||
route: { select: { checkinMinutesBefore: true, stops: { select: { stationId: true, checkinMinutesBefore: true } } } },
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
seats: {
|
||||
include: { seat: { include: { coach: { select: { id: true, coachTypeId: true } } } } },
|
||||
orderBy: [{ passengerName: 'asc' as const }, { id: 'asc' as const }],
|
||||
},
|
||||
} satisfies Prisma.BookingInclude;
|
||||
|
||||
@Injectable()
|
||||
export class UpgradeService {
|
||||
private readonly logger = new Logger(UpgradeService.name);
|
||||
|
||||
constructor(
|
||||
private prisma: PrismaService,
|
||||
private bookingsService: BookingsService,
|
||||
private seatsService: SeatsService,
|
||||
private segmentsService: SegmentsService,
|
||||
private ticketsService: TicketsService,
|
||||
private paymentsService: PaymentsService,
|
||||
private supplementaryCharges: SupplementaryChargesService,
|
||||
private currencyService: CurrencyService,
|
||||
private auditService: AuditService,
|
||||
private eventEmitter: EventEmitter2,
|
||||
private systemConfig: SystemConfigService,
|
||||
) {}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Policy admin ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
async listPolicies() {
|
||||
return this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findMany({
|
||||
include: { coachType: { select: { id: true, code: true, name: true, type: true } } },
|
||||
orderBy: { rank: 'asc' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Fare classes with no upgrade policy yet — the add dialog's dropdown. */
|
||||
async listUnconfiguredCoachTypes() {
|
||||
return this.prisma.coachType.findMany({
|
||||
where: { ...NOT_A_FARE_CLASS, upgradePolicy: { is: null } },
|
||||
select: { id: true, code: true, name: true, type: true },
|
||||
orderBy: { code: 'asc' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async createPolicy(dto: CreateUpgradePolicyDto, actorId?: string) {
|
||||
const { coachTypeId, ...values } = dto;
|
||||
const coachType = await this.prisma.coachType.findUnique({ where: { id: coachTypeId } });
|
||||
if (!coachType) throw new NotFoundException('Coach type not found');
|
||||
if (isNonFareCoachType(coachType)) {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestException(`${coachType.code} is not a fare class — no seats are sold in it.`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const existing = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findUnique({ where: { coachTypeId } });
|
||||
if (existing) throw new ConflictException(`${coachType.code} already has an upgrade policy — edit it instead.`);
|
||||
await this.assertRankIsFree(values.rank ?? 0, null);
|
||||
|
||||
const policy = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.create({ data: { coachTypeId, ...values } });
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: actorId,
|
||||
action: AUDIT_ACTIONS.CREATE,
|
||||
entityType: AUDIT_ENTITIES.UpgradePolicy,
|
||||
entityId: policy.id,
|
||||
newData: { coachTypeCode: coachType.code, ...values },
|
||||
});
|
||||
return policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async updatePolicy(coachTypeId: string, dto: UpdateUpgradePolicyDto, actorId?: string) {
|
||||
const coachType = await this.prisma.coachType.findUnique({ where: { id: coachTypeId } });
|
||||
if (!coachType) throw new NotFoundException('Coach type not found');
|
||||
const before = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findUnique({ where: { coachTypeId } });
|
||||
if (dto.rank !== undefined) await this.assertRankIsFree(dto.rank, coachTypeId);
|
||||
|
||||
const policy = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.upsert({
|
||||
where: { coachTypeId },
|
||||
update: dto,
|
||||
create: { coachTypeId, ...dto },
|
||||
});
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: actorId,
|
||||
action: AUDIT_ACTIONS.UPDATE,
|
||||
entityType: AUDIT_ENTITIES.UpgradePolicy,
|
||||
entityId: policy.id,
|
||||
oldData: before ?? undefined,
|
||||
newData: { coachTypeCode: coachType.code, ...dto },
|
||||
});
|
||||
return policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async deletePolicy(coachTypeId: string, actorId?: string) {
|
||||
const policy = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { coachTypeId },
|
||||
include: { coachType: { select: { code: true } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (!policy) throw new NotFoundException('Upgrade policy not found');
|
||||
|
||||
await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.delete({ where: { coachTypeId } });
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: actorId,
|
||||
action: AUDIT_ACTIONS.DELETE,
|
||||
entityType: AUDIT_ENTITIES.UpgradePolicy,
|
||||
entityId: policy.id,
|
||||
oldData: policy,
|
||||
});
|
||||
// With no policy the class can be neither left nor entered — the intended effect of deleting.
|
||||
return { deleted: true, coachTypeId };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Two active policies sharing a rank make "strictly higher" undefined, so the ladder must stay
|
||||
* a total order.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private async assertRankIsFree(rank: number, exceptCoachTypeId: string | null) {
|
||||
const clash = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findFirst({
|
||||
where: { rank, isActive: true, ...(exceptCoachTypeId ? { coachTypeId: { not: exceptCoachTypeId } } : {}) },
|
||||
include: { coachType: { select: { code: true } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (clash) {
|
||||
throw new ConflictException(`Rank ${rank} is already used by ${clash.coachType.code}. Ranks must be unique.`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Reads ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
/** Per leg: who can upgrade, to which classes, and roughly what it costs. */
|
||||
async getOptions(bookingRef: string, user: ActingUser) {
|
||||
const booking = await this.load(bookingRef, user);
|
||||
const legs = this.legsOf(booking);
|
||||
const pending = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findFirst({
|
||||
where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const charge = pending?.supplementaryChargeId
|
||||
? await this.prisma.supplementaryCharge.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id: pending.supplementaryChargeId },
|
||||
select: { paymentToken: true, status: true, expiresAt: true },
|
||||
})
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
|
||||
const out = [];
|
||||
for (const leg of legs) {
|
||||
const blockers = await this.legBlockers(booking, leg);
|
||||
const targets = await this.targetsFor(leg);
|
||||
// Each passenger's own class decides what counts as "up" for them, so the source policy
|
||||
// has to be resolved per seat — on a mixed-class booking they differ.
|
||||
const sourcePolicies = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findMany({
|
||||
where: { coachTypeId: { in: [...new Set(leg.seats.map((s: any) => s.coachTypeId as string).filter(Boolean))] as string[] } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const sourceByCoachType = new Map(sourcePolicies.map((p) => [p.coachTypeId, p]));
|
||||
|
||||
const passengers = leg.seats.map((s: any) => {
|
||||
const source = sourceByCoachType.get(s.coachTypeId);
|
||||
const canLeave = !!source && source.isActive && source.isUpgradable;
|
||||
return {
|
||||
bookingSeatId: s.id,
|
||||
passengerName: s.passengerName,
|
||||
passengerCategory: s.passengerCategory,
|
||||
seatId: s.seatId,
|
||||
seatLabel: s.seatLabel,
|
||||
coachTypeId: s.coachTypeId,
|
||||
currentRank: source?.rank ?? null,
|
||||
currentFareMinor: s.fareMinor ?? 0,
|
||||
// A passenger can only move up from where they actually sit, which on a mixed-class
|
||||
// booking differs per passenger. No policy on their current class means they cannot
|
||||
// leave it at all.
|
||||
targets: canLeave
|
||||
? targets.filter((t) => t.rank > source!.rank && t.coachTypeId !== s.coachTypeId)
|
||||
: [],
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
out.push({
|
||||
leg: leg.leg,
|
||||
scheduleId: leg.scheduleId,
|
||||
originStationId: leg.originStationId,
|
||||
destinationStationId: leg.destinationStationId,
|
||||
departureAt: leg.departureAt,
|
||||
checkinCutoffAt: leg.checkin?.cutoffAt ?? null,
|
||||
checkinMinutes: leg.checkin?.checkinMinutes ?? null,
|
||||
canUpgrade: blockers.length === 0 && passengers.some((p: any) => p.targets.length > 0),
|
||||
blockers,
|
||||
passengers,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const history = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findMany({
|
||||
where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: { not: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' } },
|
||||
orderBy: { createdAt: 'desc' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
bookingRef: booking.bookingRef,
|
||||
bookingType: booking.bookingType,
|
||||
legs: out,
|
||||
pending: pending ? { ...pending, paymentToken: charge?.paymentToken ?? null } : null,
|
||||
history,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Quote / create / apply ───────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Takes the seat hold for an upgrade attempt.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Server-side rather than letting the portal call `/seats/hold` directly, because an upgrade
|
||||
* holds on the SAME schedule the booking already occupies — so a retry collides with the
|
||||
* caller's own abandoned attempt: first on the synthetic passenger id, and if they re-pick the
|
||||
* same seat, on the seat itself. Clearing this booking's own stale upgrade holds first is the
|
||||
* only way a passenger can change their mind inside the hold TTL. Deriving the schedule and
|
||||
* stations from the booking instead of trusting the client is a bonus.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
async holdForUpgrade(bookingRef: string, dto: UpgradeHoldDto, user: ActingUser) {
|
||||
const booking = await this.load(bookingRef, user);
|
||||
const legNo = dto.leg ?? 1;
|
||||
const leg = this.legsOf(booking).find((l) => l.leg === legNo);
|
||||
if (!leg) throw new BadRequestException(`Booking has no leg ${legNo}`);
|
||||
|
||||
await this.releaseAbandonedHolds(booking.bookingRef, leg.scheduleId);
|
||||
|
||||
return this.seatsService.holdSeats({
|
||||
scheduleId: leg.scheduleId,
|
||||
originStationId: leg.originStationId,
|
||||
destinationStationId: leg.destinationStationId,
|
||||
journeyDirection: legNo === 2 ? JourneyDirection.RETURN : JourneyDirection.ONE_WAY,
|
||||
// Synthetic ids: there is no real passenger id to hand, and holdSeats only uses them to
|
||||
// stop one passenger holding two seats on a leg. Tagged with the booking ref so this
|
||||
// booking's own abandoned attempts can be told apart from anyone else's hold.
|
||||
passengers: dto.seatIds.map((seatId, i) => ({
|
||||
passengerId: `${this.upgradeHoldPrefix(bookingRef)}${i}`,
|
||||
seatId,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
} as any);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private upgradeHoldPrefix(bookingRef: string) {
|
||||
return `upgrade-${bookingRef}-`;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Deletes holds this booking's own earlier upgrade attempts left behind, except one already
|
||||
* committed to a PENDING_PAYMENT upgrade (that one is paid-for and must survive).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private async releaseAbandonedHolds(bookingRef: string, scheduleId: string) {
|
||||
const prefix = this.upgradeHoldPrefix(bookingRef);
|
||||
const live = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findMany({
|
||||
where: { status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT', holdId: { not: null } },
|
||||
select: { holdId: true },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const committed = new Set(live.map((u) => u.holdId!));
|
||||
|
||||
const holds = await this.prisma.seatHold.findMany({ where: { scheduleId } });
|
||||
const mine = holds.filter((h) => {
|
||||
if (committed.has(h.id)) return false;
|
||||
if (!h.createdBy?.trimStart().startsWith('{')) return false;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const meta = JSON.parse(h.createdBy);
|
||||
return (meta.passengers ?? []).some((p: any) => String(p.passengerId ?? '').startsWith(prefix));
|
||||
} catch {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (mine.length) {
|
||||
await this.prisma.seatHold.deleteMany({ where: { id: { in: mine.map((h) => h.id) } } });
|
||||
this.logger.log(`Released ${mine.length} abandoned upgrade hold(s) for ${bookingRef}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async quote(bookingRef: string, dto: UpgradeQuoteDto, user: ActingUser) {
|
||||
const booking = await this.load(bookingRef, user);
|
||||
return this.buildQuote(booking, dto);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async create(bookingRef: string, dto: CreateUpgradeDto, user: ActingUser) {
|
||||
const booking = await this.load(bookingRef, user);
|
||||
const q = await this.buildQuote(booking, dto, { skipAvailability: true });
|
||||
if (!q.allowed) throw new BadRequestException(q.blockers.join(' '));
|
||||
|
||||
const hold = await this.prisma.seatHold.findUnique({ where: { id: dto.holdId } });
|
||||
if (!hold || hold.expiresAt < new Date()) throw new BadRequestException('Seat hold expired');
|
||||
if (hold.scheduleId !== q.scheduleId) throw new BadRequestException('Seat hold is for a different schedule');
|
||||
const held = new Set(hold.seatIds);
|
||||
if (!q.items.every((it) => held.has(it.newSeatId))) {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestException('Selected seats are not covered by the hold');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const requestedBy = user.id ?? user.sub ?? booking.passengerId;
|
||||
// Deadline is the earlier of the usual 2h payment window and the check-in cutoff, so a
|
||||
// passenger can never pay for an upgrade after boarding has closed on it.
|
||||
const windowMinutes = await this.systemConfig.getNumber(CONFIG_KEYS.UPGRADE_PAYMENT_WINDOW_MINUTES);
|
||||
const expiresAt = computePaymentDeadline(
|
||||
new Date(),
|
||||
q.checkin.segmentTime,
|
||||
q.checkin.checkinMinutes,
|
||||
windowMinutes,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const upgrade = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.create({
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
bookingId: booking.id,
|
||||
leg: q.leg,
|
||||
status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT',
|
||||
requestedBy,
|
||||
scheduleId: q.scheduleId,
|
||||
items: q.items as unknown as Prisma.InputJsonValue,
|
||||
holdId: dto.holdId,
|
||||
oldFareMinor: q.oldFareMinor,
|
||||
newFareMinor: q.newFareMinor,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: q.fareDifferenceMinor,
|
||||
feeMinor: q.feeMinor,
|
||||
amountDueMinor: q.amountDueMinor,
|
||||
expiresAt: q.amountDueMinor > 0 ? expiresAt : null,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (q.amountDueMinor === 0) {
|
||||
await this.apply(upgrade.id);
|
||||
return { upgradeId: upgrade.id, status: 'APPLIED', amountDueMinor: 0, paymentToken: null, quote: q };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const charge = await this.supplementaryCharges.create({
|
||||
bookingRef: booking.bookingRef,
|
||||
amountMinor: q.amountDueMinor,
|
||||
reason: UPGRADE_CHARGE_REASON,
|
||||
notes: `Upgrade leg ${q.leg} → ${q.newCoachTypeCode} (${q.items.length} passenger(s))`,
|
||||
createdBy: requestedBy,
|
||||
expiresAt,
|
||||
});
|
||||
await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.update({
|
||||
where: { id: upgrade.id },
|
||||
data: { supplementaryChargeId: charge.id },
|
||||
});
|
||||
// Same instant the charge carries, so the hold and the payment link die together.
|
||||
await this.seatsService.confirmSeats(q.items.map((it) => it.newSeatId), new Date(), expiresAt);
|
||||
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: requestedBy,
|
||||
action: AUDIT_ACTIONS.CREATE,
|
||||
entityType: AUDIT_ENTITIES.BookingUpgrade,
|
||||
entityId: upgrade.id,
|
||||
newData: {
|
||||
bookingRef: booking.bookingRef,
|
||||
leg: q.leg,
|
||||
newCoachTypeId: dto.newCoachTypeId,
|
||||
amountDueMinor: q.amountDueMinor,
|
||||
chargeId: charge.id,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
return {
|
||||
upgradeId: upgrade.id,
|
||||
status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT',
|
||||
amountDueMinor: q.amountDueMinor,
|
||||
paymentToken: charge.paymentToken,
|
||||
expiresAt,
|
||||
quote: q,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Entry point for the paid-charge event. Idempotent: only a PENDING_PAYMENT row is applied. */
|
||||
async applyForCharge(supplementaryChargeId: string) {
|
||||
const u = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findUnique({ where: { supplementaryChargeId } });
|
||||
if (!u || u.status !== 'PENDING_PAYMENT') return;
|
||||
await this.apply(u.id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Moves the named passengers into their new seats. The schedule never changes. */
|
||||
async apply(upgradeId: string) {
|
||||
const u = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findUnique({ where: { id: upgradeId } });
|
||||
if (!u) throw new NotFoundException('Upgrade not found');
|
||||
if (u.status !== 'PENDING_PAYMENT') return u;
|
||||
|
||||
const booking = await this.prisma.booking.findUnique({ where: { id: u.bookingId }, include: bookingInclude });
|
||||
if (!booking) throw new NotFoundException('Booking not found');
|
||||
const items = u.items as unknown as UpgradeItem[];
|
||||
|
||||
const seatById = new Map(booking.seats.map((s) => [s.id, s]));
|
||||
for (const it of items) {
|
||||
if (!seatById.has(it.bookingSeatId)) {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestException('A passenger on this upgrade is no longer on the booking');
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const newTotal = Math.max(0, booking.totalMinor + u.fareDifferenceMinor);
|
||||
const displayTotal =
|
||||
booking.displayCurrency && booking.displayCurrency !== 'ETB'
|
||||
? await this.currencyService.convertAmount(newTotal, 'ETB' as any, booking.displayCurrency as any)
|
||||
: newTotal;
|
||||
|
||||
await this.prisma.$transaction(async (tx) => {
|
||||
await tx.booking.update({
|
||||
where: { id: booking.id },
|
||||
data: { totalMinor: newTotal, displayTotalMinor: displayTotal },
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Two passes, as the reschedule flow does. Here it is defensive rather than required: the
|
||||
// schedule is unchanged, so `@@unique([scheduleId, seatId])` can only collide when one
|
||||
// request upgrades two passengers and the second lands on a seat the first is vacating
|
||||
// (B: EBC→VIP frees EBC-7 while A: RS→EBC takes it). Parking every row on a per-row-unique
|
||||
// sentinel first makes the write order irrelevant.
|
||||
for (const it of items) {
|
||||
await tx.bookingSeat.update({
|
||||
where: { id: it.bookingSeatId },
|
||||
data: { scheduleId: `moving-${it.bookingSeatId}` },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (const it of items) {
|
||||
await tx.bookingSeat.update({
|
||||
where: { id: it.bookingSeatId },
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
seatId: it.newSeatId,
|
||||
scheduleId: u.scheduleId,
|
||||
fareMinor: it.newFareMinor,
|
||||
seatLabelSnapshot: null,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
await tx.bookingModification.create({
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
bookingId: booking.id,
|
||||
modifiedBy: u.requestedBy,
|
||||
modificationType: 'UPGRADE',
|
||||
oldData: {
|
||||
leg: u.leg,
|
||||
scheduleId: u.scheduleId,
|
||||
items: items.map((i) => ({
|
||||
bookingSeatId: i.bookingSeatId, passengerName: i.passengerName,
|
||||
seatId: i.oldSeatId, seatLabel: i.oldSeatLabel,
|
||||
coachTypeId: i.oldCoachTypeId, fareMinor: i.oldFareMinor,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
},
|
||||
newData: {
|
||||
leg: u.leg,
|
||||
scheduleId: u.scheduleId,
|
||||
feeMinor: u.feeMinor,
|
||||
items: items.map((i) => ({
|
||||
bookingSeatId: i.bookingSeatId, passengerName: i.passengerName,
|
||||
seatId: i.newSeatId, seatLabel: i.newSeatLabel,
|
||||
coachTypeId: i.newCoachTypeId, fareMinor: i.newFareMinor,
|
||||
})),
|
||||
},
|
||||
fareAdjustment: u.fareDifferenceMinor,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await tx.bookingUpgrade.update({
|
||||
where: { id: u.id },
|
||||
data: { status: 'APPLIED', appliedAt: new Date() },
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Occupancy + tickets are rebuilt from the (now updated) booking, outside the transaction.
|
||||
const fresh = await this.prisma.booking.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id: booking.id },
|
||||
include: { seats: true, tickets: { select: { id: true } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (fresh) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await this.seatsService.releaseSeats(fresh.id);
|
||||
await this.paymentsService.createJourneySegments(fresh as any);
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
this.logger.error(`Upgrade ${u.id}: journey segments failed: ${err instanceof Error ? err.message : err}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Old tickets' SYSTEM seat blocks reference ticket ids generate() is about to delete, and
|
||||
// generate() only clears blocks for the booking's CURRENT seats — the vacated seat is no
|
||||
// longer among them, so its block would survive.
|
||||
for (const t of fresh.tickets) {
|
||||
await this.prisma.seatBlock.deleteMany({ where: { reason: { contains: t.id }, blockedBy: 'SYSTEM' } });
|
||||
}
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await this.ticketsService.generate(fresh.id);
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
this.logger.error(`Upgrade ${u.id}: ticket generation failed: ${err instanceof Error ? err.message : err}`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Unlike reschedule, this upgrade stayed on the SAME schedule — so the booking's original
|
||||
// seat hold is still in scope and would keep the vacated seat reading HELD on the very train
|
||||
// still being sold. Clearing it is what puts that seat back on sale.
|
||||
await this.prisma.seatHold.deleteMany({
|
||||
where: {
|
||||
OR: [
|
||||
{ id: u.holdId ?? '' },
|
||||
{ scheduleId: u.scheduleId, seatIds: { hasSome: items.map((i) => i.oldSeatId) } },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await this.auditService.log({
|
||||
userId: u.requestedBy,
|
||||
action: AUDIT_ACTIONS.UPDATE,
|
||||
entityType: AUDIT_ENTITIES.Booking,
|
||||
entityId: booking.id,
|
||||
oldData: { leg: u.leg, items: items.map((i) => ({ seatId: i.oldSeatId, coachTypeId: i.oldCoachTypeId })) },
|
||||
newData: {
|
||||
leg: u.leg,
|
||||
upgradeId: u.id,
|
||||
feeMinor: u.feeMinor,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: u.fareDifferenceMinor,
|
||||
items: items.map((i) => ({ seatId: i.newSeatId, coachTypeId: i.newCoachTypeId })),
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
this.eventEmitter.emit('booking.upgraded', { booking: fresh ?? booking, upgrade: u });
|
||||
return { ...u, status: 'APPLIED' };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Cron hook: unpaid upgrades past their payment deadline. The seat hold lapses by itself. */
|
||||
async expireStale(now = new Date()): Promise<number> {
|
||||
const stale = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findMany({
|
||||
where: { status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT', expiresAt: { lt: now } },
|
||||
select: { id: true, supplementaryChargeId: true },
|
||||
});
|
||||
for (const u of stale) {
|
||||
await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.update({ where: { id: u.id }, data: { status: 'EXPIRED' } });
|
||||
if (u.supplementaryChargeId) {
|
||||
await this.prisma.supplementaryCharge.updateMany({
|
||||
where: { id: u.supplementaryChargeId, status: 'PENDING' },
|
||||
data: { status: 'EXPIRED' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return stale.length;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Internals ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
private load(bookingRef: string, user: ActingUser) {
|
||||
return loadOwnedBooking(this.prisma, bookingRef, user, bookingInclude, 'upgrade it') as Promise<
|
||||
Prisma.BookingGetPayload<{ include: typeof bookingInclude }>
|
||||
>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private legsOf(booking: any) {
|
||||
const legs: any[] = [];
|
||||
const build = (n: number, scheduleId: string, schedule: any, originStationId: string, destinationStationId: string) => {
|
||||
const seats = (booking.seats as any[])
|
||||
.filter((s) => (s.leg ?? 1) === n)
|
||||
.map((s) => ({
|
||||
id: s.id,
|
||||
seatId: s.seatId,
|
||||
seatLabel: s.seatLabelSnapshot ?? s.seat?.seatNumber ?? null,
|
||||
passengerName: s.passengerName,
|
||||
passengerCategory: s.passengerCategory,
|
||||
fareMinor: s.fareMinor,
|
||||
coachTypeId: s.seat?.coach?.coachTypeId,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
if (!seats.length || !schedule) return;
|
||||
legs.push({ leg: n, scheduleId, schedule, originStationId, destinationStationId, departureAt: schedule.departureAt, seats });
|
||||
};
|
||||
build(1, booking.scheduleId, booking.schedule, booking.originStationId, booking.destinationStationId);
|
||||
if (booking.bookingType === 'ROUND_TRIP') {
|
||||
build(2, booking.returnScheduleId, booking.returnSchedule, booking.returnOriginStationId, booking.returnDestinationStationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return legs;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Resolves the boarding stop's check-in cutoff — the deadline US-17 §1 means by "before check-in". */
|
||||
private async resolveLegCheckin(leg: any) {
|
||||
const stopTime = await this.prisma.tripStopTime.findFirst({
|
||||
where: { scheduleId: leg.scheduleId, stationId: leg.originStationId ?? undefined },
|
||||
select: { plannedArrivalAt: true, plannedDepartureAt: true },
|
||||
});
|
||||
return resolveCheckinCutoff(leg.schedule, stopTime, leg.originStationId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private async legBlockers(booking: any, leg: any, now = new Date()): Promise<string[]> {
|
||||
const blockers: string[] = [];
|
||||
if (!['ONE_WAY', 'ROUND_TRIP'].includes(booking.bookingType)) blockers.push('Only one-way and round-trip bookings can be upgraded.');
|
||||
if (booking.status !== 'CONFIRMED') blockers.push('Only confirmed bookings can be upgraded.');
|
||||
if (booking.outboundBoardedAt || booking.returnBoardedAt) blockers.push('This booking has already been used for travel.');
|
||||
if (leg.schedule?.status !== 'SCHEDULED' || leg.departureAt <= now) blockers.push('This departure is no longer upgradable.');
|
||||
|
||||
leg.checkin = await this.resolveLegCheckin(leg);
|
||||
if (leg.checkin.cutoffAt <= now) {
|
||||
blockers.push(`Upgrades close ${leg.checkin.checkinMinutes} minutes before departure.`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// One change at a time. Two live supplementary charges could both drive ticket regeneration
|
||||
// on this booking and interleave unpredictably.
|
||||
const pendingUpgrade = await this.prisma.bookingUpgrade.findFirst({
|
||||
where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (pendingUpgrade) blockers.push('An upgrade is already awaiting payment for this booking.');
|
||||
const pendingReschedule = await this.prisma.bookingReschedule.findFirst({
|
||||
where: { bookingId: booking.id, status: 'PENDING_PAYMENT' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (pendingReschedule) blockers.push('A reschedule is awaiting payment for this booking — finish or cancel it first.');
|
||||
|
||||
return blockers;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Fare classes on this schedule that anyone could upgrade into. */
|
||||
private async targetsFor(leg: any) {
|
||||
const assignments = await this.prisma.coachAssignment.findMany({
|
||||
where: { scheduleId: leg.scheduleId, isOperational: true },
|
||||
select: { coach: { select: { coachTypeId: true } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const onBoard = [...new Set(assignments.map((a) => a.coach.coachTypeId))];
|
||||
if (!onBoard.length) return [];
|
||||
|
||||
const policies = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findMany({
|
||||
where: { coachTypeId: { in: onBoard }, isActive: true, isTargetable: true, coachType: NOT_A_FARE_CLASS },
|
||||
include: { coachType: { select: { id: true, code: true, name: true } } },
|
||||
orderBy: { rank: 'asc' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
return policies.map((p) => ({
|
||||
coachTypeId: p.coachTypeId,
|
||||
code: p.coachType.code,
|
||||
name: p.coachType.name,
|
||||
rank: p.rank,
|
||||
feePercent: p.feePercent,
|
||||
feeMinMinor: p.feeMinMinor,
|
||||
feeWaived: p.feeWaived,
|
||||
}));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private async buildQuote(booking: any, dto: UpgradeQuoteDto, opts: { skipAvailability?: boolean } = {}) {
|
||||
const legNo = dto.leg ?? 1;
|
||||
const leg = this.legsOf(booking).find((l) => l.leg === legNo);
|
||||
if (!leg) throw new BadRequestException(`Booking has no leg ${legNo}`);
|
||||
|
||||
const blockers = await this.legBlockers(booking, leg);
|
||||
|
||||
const target = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { coachTypeId: dto.newCoachTypeId },
|
||||
include: { coachType: { select: { id: true, code: true, name: true, type: true, seatClasses: { where: { isActive: true } } } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (!target) throw new NotFoundException('That fare class has no upgrade policy');
|
||||
if (!target.isActive || !target.isTargetable) blockers.push(`${target.coachType.code} cannot be upgraded to.`);
|
||||
|
||||
const onSchedule = await this.prisma.coachAssignment.count({
|
||||
where: { scheduleId: leg.scheduleId, isOperational: true, coach: { coachTypeId: dto.newCoachTypeId } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (!onSchedule) blockers.push(`${target.coachType.code} is not available on this train.`);
|
||||
|
||||
const seatRows = await this.prisma.seat.findMany({
|
||||
where: { id: { in: dto.items.map((i) => i.newSeatId) } },
|
||||
include: { coach: { select: { id: true, coachTypeId: true } } },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const seatById = new Map(seatRows.map((s) => [s.id, s]));
|
||||
if (seatRows.length !== dto.items.length) blockers.push('One or more selected seats do not exist.');
|
||||
if (new Set(dto.items.map((i) => i.newSeatId)).size !== dto.items.length) blockers.push('Duplicate seats selected.');
|
||||
|
||||
const stopTimes = await this.prisma.tripStopTime.findMany({
|
||||
where: { scheduleId: leg.scheduleId },
|
||||
include: { station: { select: { code: true } } },
|
||||
orderBy: { sequence: 'asc' },
|
||||
});
|
||||
const originStop = stopTimes.find((s) => s.stationId === leg.originStationId);
|
||||
const destStop = stopTimes.find((s) => s.stationId === leg.destinationStationId);
|
||||
if (!originStop || !destStop) blockers.push('This leg\'s route could not be resolved.');
|
||||
|
||||
const { nationalityType, nationality } = resolveNationalityProxy(booking.displayCurrency);
|
||||
const segmentRoute = originStop && destStop ? `${originStop.station.code}-${destStop.station.code}` : undefined;
|
||||
|
||||
const bookingSeats = new Map(leg.seats.map((s: any) => [s.id, s]));
|
||||
const items: UpgradeItem[] = [];
|
||||
let oldFareMinor = 0;
|
||||
let newFareMinor = 0;
|
||||
let feeMinor = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for (const req of dto.items) {
|
||||
const current: any = bookingSeats.get(req.bookingSeatId);
|
||||
if (!current) { blockers.push('A selected passenger is not on this leg.'); break; }
|
||||
|
||||
const source = await this.prisma.upgradePolicy.findUnique({ where: { coachTypeId: current.coachTypeId } });
|
||||
if (!source || !source.isActive || !source.isUpgradable) {
|
||||
blockers.push(`${current.passengerName} is in a class that cannot be upgraded.`);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (target.rank <= source.rank) {
|
||||
blockers.push(`${target.coachType.code} is not an upgrade from ${current.passengerName}'s current class.`);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const seat = seatById.get(req.newSeatId);
|
||||
if (!seat) break; // already reported above
|
||||
if (seat.coach.coachTypeId !== dto.newCoachTypeId) {
|
||||
blockers.push('Every selected seat must be in the fare class being upgraded to.');
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const seatClass = originStop && destStop
|
||||
? pickSeatClass(target.coachType.seatClasses, seat.bedPosition, nationalityType)
|
||||
: null;
|
||||
if (!seatClass) { blockers.push('No fare is configured for the selected seat.'); break; }
|
||||
|
||||
const seatFare = await this.bookingsService.getBaseFare(
|
||||
leg.scheduleId, seatClass.id, segmentRoute, undefined, nationality,
|
||||
originStop!.sequence, destStop!.sequence, originStop!.stationId, destStop!.stationId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const currentFare = current.fareMinor ?? 0;
|
||||
const amounts = computeUpgradeAmounts(target, currentFare, seatFare);
|
||||
|
||||
// Refuse rather than credit. A "higher" class pricing below the current seat means the fare
|
||||
// configuration disagrees with the ladder; handing out a free upgrade would hide that.
|
||||
if (amounts.fareDifferenceMinor <= 0) {
|
||||
blockers.push(`${target.coachType.code} is not priced above ${current.passengerName}'s current seat on this route.`);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
oldFareMinor += currentFare;
|
||||
newFareMinor += seatFare;
|
||||
feeMinor += amounts.feeMinor;
|
||||
items.push({
|
||||
bookingSeatId: current.id,
|
||||
passengerName: current.passengerName,
|
||||
passengerCategory: current.passengerCategory,
|
||||
oldSeatId: current.seatId,
|
||||
oldSeatLabel: current.seatLabel,
|
||||
oldCoachTypeId: current.coachTypeId,
|
||||
oldSeatClassId: null,
|
||||
oldFareMinor: currentFare,
|
||||
newSeatId: seat.id,
|
||||
newSeatLabel: seat.seatNumber,
|
||||
newCoachTypeId: seat.coach.coachTypeId,
|
||||
newSeatClassId: seatClass.id,
|
||||
newFareMinor: seatFare,
|
||||
feeMinor: amounts.feeMinor,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor: amounts.fareDifferenceMinor,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Availability last, so a bad selection reports the clearer error first.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Skipped when re-quoting inside create(): by then the caller is holding these very seats,
|
||||
// so this check would see their own hold and refuse the upgrade they just paid to make. The
|
||||
// hold itself is the stronger guarantee — holdSeats ran assertNoRouteSeatConflict plus the
|
||||
// hold and journey-segment collision checks, and create() verifies the hold is unexpired,
|
||||
// for this schedule, and covers exactly these seats.
|
||||
if (!opts.skipAvailability && !blockers.length && originStop && destStop) {
|
||||
const free = await this.segmentsService.getFreeSeatIds(
|
||||
leg.scheduleId,
|
||||
items.map((i) => i.newSeatId),
|
||||
stopTimes as any,
|
||||
originStop.sequence,
|
||||
destStop.sequence,
|
||||
legNo === 2 ? JourneyDirection.RETURN : JourneyDirection.ONE_WAY,
|
||||
);
|
||||
const taken = items.filter((i) => !free.has(i.newSeatId));
|
||||
if (taken.length) blockers.push('One or more selected seats have just been taken.');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const fareDifferenceMinor = newFareMinor - oldFareMinor;
|
||||
return {
|
||||
allowed: blockers.length === 0 && items.length === dto.items.length,
|
||||
blockers: Array.from(new Set(blockers)),
|
||||
leg: legNo,
|
||||
scheduleId: leg.scheduleId,
|
||||
newCoachTypeId: dto.newCoachTypeId,
|
||||
newCoachTypeCode: target.coachType.code,
|
||||
newCoachTypeName: target.coachType.name,
|
||||
checkin: leg.checkin,
|
||||
items,
|
||||
oldFareMinor,
|
||||
newFareMinor,
|
||||
fareDifferenceMinor,
|
||||
feeMinor,
|
||||
amountDueMinor: feeMinor + Math.max(0, fareDifferenceMinor),
|
||||
currency: 'ETB',
|
||||
policy: { feePercent: target.feePercent, feeMinMinor: target.feeMinMinor, feeWaived: target.feeWaived },
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user