New endpoints:
POST invoices/eims/bulk-register { invoiceIds: [...] } — trigger
POST eims/webhook/bulk-register — MoR's callback
Fundamentally different shape from single register: bulkRegister
answers only {conversationId, status:202} immediately: MoR processes
the array asynchronously and pushes the real per-invoice results
(a mix of accepted/rejected in one array, per the collection's own
examples) to a webhook configured out of band. So this ships as two
halves that don't share a call stack — EimsBulkRegistrationService.
registerBulk() reserves a contiguous block of counters (durable
reservation, same doctrine as single register, extended to N items)
and submits; handleBulkCallback(), invoked by the new
EimsWebhookController whenever MoR gets around to it, settles.
New EimsSystemState.inFlightConversationId is the bulk equivalent of
inFlightInvoiceId — a whole batch outstanding, not one invoice — and
the two markers block each other since they share the same counter
sequence. The conversation id isn't known until MoR's 202 arrives, so
reservation stamps a locally-generated placeholder first (same
commit-before-the-network-call reasoning as single register), then
swaps it for MoR's real id right after — the only value the callback
can actually use to find the batch again.
Only the first invoice in a bulk batch chains via PreviousIrn — every
other item gets an empty string, matching the collection's own
two-invoice example exactly (MoR doesn't expect a batch to chain to
IRNs that don't exist yet at submission time).
Webhook has no auth (MoR has no JWT to send) — the conversation id
embedded in the payload is what stands between this and a forged
callback: an item only ever touches an invoice actually holding that
exact id, and an unknown id is logged and ignored, never applied.
Migration 3580000000000: eims_system_state.in_flight_conversation_id,
invoices.eims_bulk_conversation_id (tags which batch an invoice was
submitted in, so a stuck batch — webhook never arrived — can be found
and reconciled by conversation id). Applied to dev DB and recorded in
freight.migrations directly (idempotent IF NOT EXISTS DDL).
Not live-testable from this sandbox (no route to MoR's real gateway).
Signing the whole array as one envelope, the way single /v1/register
was confirmed live to need despite the collection's raw example
showing no envelope, is the reasonable extension of that confirmed
behavior, not a blind guess — but it has not itself been exercised
against the real gateway. Left for the first live bulk attempt to
confirm, same as every other MoR-facing assumption this integration
has made.
Title and subtitle grew unbounded, relying only on flex-squeeze from action
buttons to ever truncate. Caps the container at 640px and gives the
subtitle the same truncate treatment the title already had, so a long
page title or description (report descriptions in particular) always
ellipses instead of stretching the header.
Swaps ReportView's bespoke ReportFilters for the same FilterBar/useFilters
combo BookingRequestsPage uses — pills, saved-view-ready state, URL sync.
toFilterDefs() maps the report catalog's own filter vocabulary
(daterange/date/select/multiselect/text) onto FilterDef, matched against
every report definition's backend param handling. The search box only
shows for reports that actually implement `search` server-side, so it's
not a dead control on the rest. ReportFilters.tsx is now dead, removed.
DateBody always initialized its op state to DEFAULT_OP.date ("between"),
ignoring a def's `operators` restriction. A single-operator exact-date
filter (e.g. `operators: ["before"]`) opened on the range UI with no way
off it, since OperatorSelect hides itself when there's only one choice.
Default to the def's first allowed operator instead.
- Add migration for consolidation approvals table and status enum
- Create ConsolidationApprovalService to handle approval logic
- Implement repository for managing consolidation approvals
- Add entity for consolidation approval with necessary fields
- Develop frontend components for displaying and managing consolidation approvals
- Create tests for consolidation approval service to ensure correct behavior
- Add migration for consolidation approvals table and status enum
- Create ConsolidationApprovalService to handle approval logic
- Implement repository for managing consolidation approvals
- Add entity for consolidation approval with necessary fields
- Develop frontend components for displaying and managing consolidation approvals
- Create tests for consolidation approval service to ensure correct behavior
- Added support for viewing and managing consolidated bookings in BookingRequestDetailPage.
- Enhanced BookingRequestsPage to display paired bookings in a single row.
- Introduced pairedDecision method in bookings service to handle decisions for both halves of a consolidated pair.
- Updated contracts service to include methods for manual consolidation of odd-20ft bookings.
- Created new components for selecting and editing consolidation partners.
- Added tests for paired decision logic and manual consolidation scenarios.
- Updated UI to reflect changes in booking handling and provide user feedback for odd container counts.
Confirmed live 2026-08-17: buyer profiles store just the sub-city name
("Bole", "Arada") as their woreda, never the source CSV's specific
example-woreda name ("Bole Woreda 01") — hit for three different
buyers in a row (Bole, Arada, Lemi Kura) before any got past this
check. Since the CSV lists exactly one representative woreda per
Addis sub-city, alias the bare name to that same code instead of
waiting on a fuller table — use what's already been supplied first.
Lemi Kura itself isn't in the source CSV at all (one of Addis
Ababa's newer sub-cities) — still needs its real code from MoR.
The switch clears the registration but not the tax number, so the company step
reopens with the old TIN and RHF re-seeds the field when the profile refetch
lands. A TIN typed before that arrived was silently replaced by the stored one
and the lookup ran against the wrong number.
The spec now waits for the rehydrated VAT value, then asserts the field holds
what it typed before waiting on eTrade.
