Targets could only be committed weekly, monthly, quarterly or yearly, so a
figure the business quotes per half-year or per 90 days had to be split by
hand into buckets it was never expressed in. The reports already re-gather
a target into whatever grain the viewer asks for; this just lets the plan
be entered at the grain it was agreed in.
Adds day, half-year, nine-month and 90-day, matching the report units added
alongside. normalisePeriodStart snaps each to its block start with the same
calendar-year anchoring the SQL uses — Jan/Jul for half-years, Jan/Oct for
nine-months, days 1/91/181/271 for 90-day blocks, including the same cap on
the fourth block so late December does not snap into a stub of its own.
That agreement is the load-bearing part. The unique index is keyed on
period_start, and a target snapped to a boundary the report does not bucket
on is a plan measured against a period that does not exist. The two halves
live in different files and different languages, so the spec pins the
boundaries rather than trusting them to stay in step.
Adds operations-targets.service.spec.ts, which the module had none of:
every period type, idempotency, the leap year, and the block-four cap.
The OCC report plans a station lane per cargo type — Nagad–Mojo container
and Nagad–Mojo fertilizer are separate numbers — but a target's identity
was period + metric + dimension + dimensionKey, so the two collided on
one slot. `cargo_category` is now part of the row and of the uniqueness
check; it stays null for cargo_category and container_class targets,
whose dimensionKey already carries the category.
The config grid showed raw codes (VOLUME_TONS, cargo_category, a yard
code). The list read now sends readable twins alongside the stored codes,
which stay exactly as they are because the reports join on them — the
same shape YardDistancesService uses. Labels resolve per dimension rather
than from one merged map: CONTAINER_EXPORT exists in both vocabularies
and reads differently in each, and merging them gave every cargo-category
row the container-class wording.
