Add 'assign-reviewer' action and related functionality for license review process

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/components/DecisionConfirmModal.tsx

@@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ export function DecisionConfirmModal({
 
   if (!action) return null;
 
-  const needsOfficer = action.id === 'assign' || action.id === 'escalate';
+  const needsOfficer =
+    action.id === 'assign' ||
+    action.id === 'assign-reviewer' ||
+    action.id === 'escalate';
   const reasonMissing = action.requiresReason && !reason.trim() && !reasonCode;
   const blocked =
     reasonMissing ||

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/config/actions.ts

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ export type ActionTier =
 export type ActionId =
   | 'claim'
   | 'assign'
+  | 'assign-reviewer'
   | 'escalate'
   | 'hold'
   | 'resume'
@@ -68,6 +69,18 @@ export const ACTIONS: ActionDefinition[] = [
   // Claim is deliberately absent here: an officer claims from the queue
   // (LicenseQueuePage), not from this detail page. That implementation is
   // separate — see LicenseQueuePage/actions.tsx — and is unaffected by this.
+  {
+    // Starts the review under the push model: the team leader hands a freshly
+    // submitted (or eligibility-paid) file to an employee. Without it a CoC/CoP
+    // sitting in ELIGIBILITY_PAID had no action at all — the server offers only
+    // `claim` (a permission no seeded role holds) and this.
+    id: 'assign-reviewer',
+    tier: 'primary',
+    labelKey: 'review.actions.assignReviewer',
+    from: ['SUBMITTED', 'ELIGIBILITY_PAID'],
+    permissions: ['can:assign:license-application'],
+    emphasis: 'filled',
+  },
   {
     id: 'assign',
     tier: 'workflow',
@@ -302,6 +315,7 @@ export interface ResolveContext {
 const WORKFLOW_EVENT_IDS = new Set<ActionId>([
   'claim',
   'assign',
+  'assign-reviewer',
   'escalate',
   'hold',
   'resume',
@@ -364,9 +378,13 @@ export function resolveActions(ctx: ResolveContext): ResolvedAction[] {
         disabledReason: reason,
       });
 
-      // Decisions belong to whoever holds the application.
+      // Decisions belong to whoever holds the application. Assigning a
+      // reviewer is the team leader handing work out, so it is exempt — the
+      // leader is by definition not the officer who will hold it.
       const needsOwnership =
-        action.tier === 'primary' && action.id !== 'confirm-payment';
+        action.tier === 'primary' &&
+        action.id !== 'confirm-payment' &&
+        action.id !== 'assign-reviewer';
       if (
         needsOwnership &&
         app.assignedOfficerId &&

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/pages/LicenseReviewPage/index.tsx

@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ import {
   useLocalized,
   useApproveDocumentsMutation,
   useAssignApplicationMutation,
+  useAssignReviewerMutation,
   useClaimApplicationMutation,
   useCompleteReviewMutation,
   useConfirmPaymentMutation,
@@ -217,6 +218,7 @@ export function LicenseReviewPage() {
   const [resumeApplication] = useResumeApplicationMutation();
   const [escalateApplication] = useEscalateApplicationMutation();
   const [assignApplication] = useAssignApplicationMutation();
+  const [assignReviewer] = useAssignReviewerMutation();
   // Real officer list, so Assign and Escalate name a person instead of
   // silently reassigning to whoever already held the application.
   const { data: officers = [] } = useGetAssignableOfficersQuery();
@@ -670,6 +672,18 @@ export function LicenseReviewPage() {
             t("review.done.escalate", "Escalated"),
           );
           break;
+        case "assign-reviewer":
+          if (!submission.officerId) return;
+          await run(
+            () =>
+              assignReviewer({
+                id,
+                officerId: submission.officerId as string,
+                remark: submission.reason,
+              }).unwrap(),
+            t("review.done.assignReviewer", "Review assigned"),
+          );
+          break;
         case "assign":
           if (!submission.officerId) return;
           await run(