Merge origin/WorkflowChange into logestic_chnage

Resolves conflicts:
- LicenseReviewPage: dropped a duplicated schedule-issuance ActionIcon,
  keeping the Tooltip-wrapped one and adding scheduledPeriod (required
  by the scheduleIssuance mutation) to it.
- portal i18n (en.ts/am.ts): both sides added distinct keys under
  licensing.card (reportDamaged/reissueFailed vs status/statusReason) —
  kept both, additive.
- licensing.helpers.ts: kept sectionAppliesToKind (this branch) and
  switched to the centralized BASE_API_URL import from
  base-api/base-query-with-reauth (WorkflowChange), dropping the local
  duplicate constant.

libs/api/src/lib/features/licensing/licensing.helpers.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 import { isValidPhoneNumber } from 'libphonenumber-js';
 import { resolveTokenFromStorage } from '../../session';
+import { BASE_API_URL } from '../../base-api/base-query-with-reauth';
 import type {
   ApplicationKind,
   Bilingual,
@@ -17,10 +18,6 @@ function sectionAppliesToKind(section: FormSectionConfig, kind: ApplicationKind)
   return !section.applicationKinds?.length || section.applicationKinds.includes(kind);
 }
 
-const BASE_API_URL =
-  (import.meta as { env?: Record<string, string> }).env?.['VITE_BASE_API_URL'] ??
-  'http://localhost:3000/api';
-
 /**
  * Uploads a document straight to the API.
  *
@@ -69,6 +66,7 @@ export const STATUS_LABELS: Record<LicenseStatus, string> = {
   DRAFT: 'Draft',
   SUBMITTED: 'Submitted',
   UNDER_REVIEW: 'Under Review',
+  AWAITING_BIOMETRICS: 'Awaiting Biometrics',
   UNDER_EVALUATION: 'Under Evaluation',
   RESUBMIT_REQUIRED: 'Resubmit Required',
   INSPECTION_PENDING: 'Inspection Pending',
@@ -99,6 +97,7 @@ export const STATUS_COLORS: Record<LicenseStatus, string> = {
   DRAFT: 'gray',
   SUBMITTED: 'blue',
   UNDER_REVIEW: 'indigo',
+  AWAITING_BIOMETRICS: 'indigo',
   UNDER_EVALUATION: 'indigo',
   RESUBMIT_REQUIRED: 'orange',
   INSPECTION_PENDING: 'cyan',
@@ -138,6 +137,7 @@ export const STATUS_PROGRESS: Record<LicenseStatus, number> = {
   DRAFT: 5,
   SUBMITTED: 15,
   UNDER_REVIEW: 30,
+  AWAITING_BIOMETRICS: 30,
   UNDER_EVALUATION: 45,
   RESUBMIT_REQUIRED: 30,
   INSPECTION_PENDING: 55,
@@ -619,6 +619,49 @@ interface ConditionLike {
   anyOf?: ConditionLike[];
 }
 
+/**
+ * Section keys a condition reads, recursing `anyOf`.
+ *
+ * `FieldCondition.field` is a `sectionKey.fieldKey` path, so the prefix names
+ * the section whose answer decides the condition.
+ */
+export function conditionSections(
+  condition: FieldCondition | undefined | null,
+): string[] {
+  if (!condition) return [];
+  if (condition.anyOf) return condition.anyOf.flatMap(conditionSections);
+  if (!condition.field) return [];
+  const [sectionKey] = condition.field.split('.');
+  return sectionKey ? [sectionKey] : [];
+}
+
+/**
+ * Sections whose visibility hangs on an answer in one of `flagged`.
+ *
+ * Mirrors the server's `sectionsDependingOn`: an officer flagging the section
+ * that holds the vessel category is asking for an answer that decides which
+ * fields in other sections are required, so those sections have to open too —
+ * otherwise the applicant sees newly-required fields they cannot edit and
+ * cannot resubmit.
+ */
+export function sectionsDependingOn(
+  sections: FormSectionConfig[],
+  flagged: Set<string>,
+): Set<string> {
+  const dependent = new Set<string>();
+  if (flagged.size === 0) return dependent;
+
+  for (const section of sections) {
+    if (flagged.has(section.key)) continue;
+    const reads = [
+      section.showWhen,
+      ...(section.fields ?? []).map((field) => field.showWhen),
+    ].flatMap(conditionSections);
+    if (reads.some((key) => flagged.has(key))) dependent.add(section.key);
+  }
+  return dependent;
+}
+
 export function conditionHolds(
   condition: FieldCondition | undefined | null,
   formData: Record<string, Record<string, unknown>>,