Merge pull request #1207 from Tria-plc/freight/nati-2

Freight/nati 2
This commit is contained in:
Nathnael Wondisha
2026-08-10 09:56:59 +03:00
committed by GitHub
18 changed files with 565 additions and 93 deletions

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import {
import { Booking } from './entities/booking.entity';
import { NotificationsService } from '../notifications/notifications.service';
import { NotificationInboxService } from '../notification-inbox/notification-inbox.service';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyPhone } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyContact } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { FREIGHT_PERMS } from '../../seed/freight-permissions.registry';
/**
@@ -55,10 +55,13 @@ export class BookingLifecycleNotifierService {
logLabel: string,
): Promise<void> {
this.logger.log(`${logLabel}${this.ref(b)}`);
const phone = b.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyPhone(this.dataSource, b.companyId)
: null;
const email = b.company?.email ?? b.company?.generalManagerEmail ?? null;
// Both channels come from the same resolver: the company row's own columns
// are only half the story (see companyNotifyEmailExpr), and reading them off
// the loaded entity silently dropped every mail to a company whose address
// lives in `attributes`.
const { phone, email } = b.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyContact(this.dataSource, b.companyId)
: { phone: null, email: null };
if (phone) {
try {

View File

@@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ function makeService(overrides: Partial<Ctx> = {}) {
verifayda: {
completeVerification: jest.fn(async () => ctx.verification),
},
// Onboarding requirements resolve the nationality's document set through
// this; no setting means no company documents, which keeps those cases
// focused on the identity/PoA half of the list.
fileUploadSettings: { getByCode: jest.fn(async () => null) },
};
const service = new CompaniesService(
@@ -157,7 +161,7 @@ function makeService(overrides: Partial<Ctx> = {}) {
deps.profilesRepo as never,
{} as never,
deps.filesService as never,
{} as never,
deps.fileUploadSettings as never,
{} as never,
deps.companyNotifier as never,
{} as never,
@@ -763,6 +767,73 @@ describe("Ethiopian companies verify with Fayda; foreign companies verify identi
expect(state.gm.email).toBe("legacy@example.com");
});
// The mirror image, and the reason the fallback above is gated on the GM
// being unverified: a manager Fayda proved but supplied no email for types
// one instead, and the portal decides whether to render that input by asking
// whether the identity holds one. Reading the typed column back as part of
// the verified identity would answer "yes" the moment it was saved — the
// input would vanish and a typo could never be corrected.
it("keeps a verified GM's typed email out of the verified identity", async () => {
const { service, company } = makeService({
attributes: {
...OWNER_VERIFIED,
gmFaydaSub: "gm-sub",
gmFaydaVerifiedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00.000Z",
gmName: "Derartu Tulu",
generalManagerName: "Derartu Tulu",
generalManagerEmail: "typed@example.com",
},
});
const state = service.getCompanyIdentityState(company() as never);
expect(state.gm.verified).toBe(true);
expect(state.gm.name).toBe("Derartu Tulu");
expect(state.gm.email).toBeNull();
});
it("never stands the account in for a GM Fayda gave no email", async () => {
// Deliberate: the account is the person onboarding, not necessarily the
// manager. The portal asks for the email instead.
const { service, ctx } = makeService({
attributes: { ...OWNER_VERIFIED },
verification: {
purpose: "VERIFY",
verified: true,
sub: "gm-sub",
fullName: "Derartu Tulu",
phoneNumber: "+251911222333",
},
});
const state = await service.completeIdentityVerification(
"user-1",
{ subject: "gm", code: "c", state: "s" },
{ email: "account@example.com", phoneNumber: "+251911777777" },
);
expect(ctx.attributes.gmEmail).toBeUndefined();
expect(state.gm.verified).toBe(true);
expect(state.gm.email).toBeNull();
});
it("accepts the email typed for a GM whose verification carried none", async () => {
const { service, ctx } = makeService({
attributes: {
...OWNER_VERIFIED,
gmFaydaSub: "gm-sub",
gmName: "Derartu Tulu",
generalManagerName: "Derartu Tulu",
},
});
await service.updateProfile("user-1", {
generalManagerEmail: "gm@example.com",
} as never);
expect(ctx.attributes.generalManagerEmail).toBe("gm@example.com");
});
it("does not let an unproven GM block the company from trading", async () => {
// The GM names who to talk to, not what the company may do. Capturing it
// through Fayda changed how it is collected, not whether it gates.
@@ -775,3 +846,94 @@ describe("Ethiopian companies verify with Fayda; foreign companies verify identi
).resolves.toBeDefined();
});
});
/**
* Fayda's email and phone claims are optional, so a *verified* representative
* can still be missing the details `REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS` demands. The PoA step
* renders an input for whatever the verification did not supply — so onboarding
* has to report them outstanding, rather than letting a freight forwarder
* submit an incomplete representative and be refused its next PoA edit for it.
*/
describe("onboarding requirements name the PoA details Fayda did not supply", () => {
const POA_VERIFIED_NO_CONTACTS = {
poaFaydaSub: "poa-sub",
poaFaydaVerifiedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z",
poaName: "Tirunesh Dibaba",
};
it("reports the missing email and phone for a freight forwarder", async () => {
const { service } = makeService({
attributes: { ...OWNER_VERIFIED, ...POA_VERIFIED_NO_CONTACTS },
profileTypes: [ProfileType.freightForwarder],
files: [paper()],
});
const req = await service.getOnboardingRequirements("user-1");
expect(req.poa.missingFields.map((f) => f.key)).toEqual([
"poaEmail",
"poaPhone",
]);
expect(req.poa.complete).toBe(false);
expect(req.outstanding).toEqual(
expect.arrayContaining(["Add your poa email", "Add your poa phone"]),
);
});
it("clears once they are typed", async () => {
const { service } = makeService({
attributes: { ...OWNER_VERIFIED, ...POA_VERIFIED },
profileTypes: [ProfileType.freightForwarder],
files: [paper()],
});
const req = await service.getOnboardingRequirements("user-1");
expect(req.poa.missingFields).toEqual([]);
expect(req.poa.complete).toBe(true);
expect(req.outstanding).not.toContain("Add your poa email");
});
// Fayda's email claim is optional and the GM's verification has no account to
// fall back on, so demanding one blocked a manager the government had already
// proved. `companyNotifyEmailExpr` resolves the address from the contact
// person or the registering account instead, so nothing needs this filled.
it("does not hold a company back for a general manager with no email", async () => {
const { service } = makeService({
attributes: {
...OWNER_VERIFIED,
gmFaydaSub: "gm-sub",
generalManagerName: "Derartu Tulu",
generalManagerPhone: "+251911222333",
},
});
const req = await service.getOnboardingRequirements("user-1");
expect(req.companyInfo.missingFields.map((f) => f.key)).not.toContain(
"generalManagerEmail",
);
expect(req.outstanding).not.toContain("Add your general manager email");
});
it("still holds it back for the manager's name and phone", async () => {
const { service } = makeService({ attributes: { ...OWNER_VERIFIED } });
const req = await service.getOnboardingRequirements("user-1");
expect(req.companyInfo.missingFields.map((f) => f.key)).toEqual(
expect.arrayContaining(["generalManagerName", "generalManagerPhone"]),
);
});
// An importer that never named a representative owes nothing here — the step
// is one it may walk straight past.
it("asks nothing of a company with no PoA at all", async () => {
const { service } = makeService({ attributes: { ...OWNER_VERIFIED } });
const req = await service.getOnboardingRequirements("user-1");
expect(req.poa.missingFields).toEqual([]);
expect(req.poa.complete).toBe(true);
});
});

View File

@@ -253,11 +253,14 @@ export class CompaniesService {
label: "General manager name",
get: (c) => c.attributes?.generalManagerName,
},
{
key: "generalManagerEmail",
label: "General manager email",
get: (c) => c.attributes?.generalManagerEmail,
},
// The manager's EMAIL is deliberately absent. It was demanded because the
// notifiers were believed to mail it, and Fayda's email claim is optional
// — so a manager the government proved without one blocked the whole
// submission over an address nothing could produce. `companyNotifyEmailExpr`
// now resolves the address itself and falls through to the contact
// person's, then to the registering account's (which signup guarantees),
// so nothing depends on this being filled. It is still collected and still
// preferred when present; it just no longer holds the company hostage.
{
key: "generalManagerPhone",
label: "General manager phone",
@@ -2042,13 +2045,21 @@ export class CompaniesService {
const poaProvided = POA_ATTRIBUTES.some((k) =>
(company.attributes?.[k] as string | undefined)?.trim(),
);
// No company types its PoA details — they arrive from the Fayda
// verification whatever the nationality — so reporting them as missing
// fields would ask for something no form offers. The identity block below
// reports "verify your PoA" instead.
const missingPoaFields: typeof REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS = [];
const delegation = await this.getPoaDelegationState(company.id);
const delegationDue = poaRequired || poaProvided;
// The representative's details normally arrive from their Fayda
// verification — but Fayda's email and phone claims are optional and
// routinely come back empty, and the PoA step renders an input for whatever
// the verification did not supply. So these are askable after all, and are
// reported outstanding once a PoA is required or provided; reporting
// nothing here let a freight forwarder finish onboarding with a
// representative the API's own `REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS` calls incomplete, then
// 400'd their next PoA edit for it.
const missingPoaFields = delegationDue
? REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS.filter(
(f) => !(company.attributes?.[f.key] as string | undefined)?.trim(),
)
: [];
const missingDelegation = delegationDue && !delegation.onFile;
// A paper the reviewer sent back is not evidence — the customer has to
// replace it before the application counts as complete.
@@ -2101,7 +2112,10 @@ export class CompaniesService {
// fields, required documents, one license per operational profile, and the
// PoA details/paper whenever those are mandatory.
const requiredDocCount = documents.filter((d) => d.isRequired).length;
const poaItemCount = delegationDue ? 1 : 0;
// The delegation paper plus the representative's own required details —
// `completed` below subtracts every one of those it is still missing, so
// leaving them out of the total would make the bar understate progress.
const poaItemCount = delegationDue ? 1 + REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS.length : 0;
// One item per identity credential the company has to prove: the owner
// always (Fayda for Ethiopian, passport for foreign), plus the PoA once
// there is one — Fayda for an Ethiopian company, a named representative

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import {
import { Company, CompanyStatus } from "./entities/company.entity";
import { NotificationsService } from "../notifications/notifications.service";
import { NotificationInboxService } from "../notification-inbox/notification-inbox.service";
import { resolveCompanyNotifyPhone } from "../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util";
import { resolveCompanyNotifyContact } from "../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util";
import { FREIGHT_PERMS } from "../../seed/freight-permissions.registry";
/** Account statuses that lock the customer out and therefore must be told to them. */
@@ -38,8 +38,13 @@ export class CompanyNotifierService {
/** Send SMS + email to the company contact; log-only on failure. */
private async notifyContact(company: Company, message: string): Promise<void> {
const phone = await resolveCompanyNotifyPhone(this.dataSource, company.id);
const email = company.email ?? company.generalManagerEmail ?? null;
// One resolver for both channels — the company row's own email column is
// only set for a Fayda-verified owner (see companyNotifyEmailExpr), which
// left an approval/suspension notice unsent to everyone else.
const { phone, email } = await resolveCompanyNotifyContact(
this.dataSource,
company.id,
);
if (phone) {
try {

View File

@@ -143,12 +143,18 @@ function stateFor(
birthdate: read(`${p}Birthdate`),
gender: read(`${p}Gender`),
};
if (subject !== "gm") return state;
if (subject !== "gm" || state.verified) return state;
// Companies onboarded before the GM was verifiable have typed details and no
// `gm*` attributes at all. Report those rather than a blank card — they are
// still what the notifiers mail — leaving `verified` false so the portal
// offers the upgrade instead of pretending the identity is proven.
//
// Only for such an unverified GM, which is the whole population this exists
// for. Merging the typed columns into a *verified* manager's state would read
// back the email the portal asked them to type when Fayda supplied none, and
// the input offering it — keyed on that value being absent — would vanish the
// moment it was saved, leaving a typo uncorrectable.
return {
...state,
name: state.name ?? read(GM_TYPED_KEYS.name),

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import {
import { Contract } from './entities/contract.entity';
import { NotificationsService } from '../notifications/notifications.service';
import { NotificationInboxService } from '../notification-inbox/notification-inbox.service';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyPhone } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyContact } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { FREIGHT_PERMS } from '../../seed/freight-permissions.registry';
/**
@@ -52,10 +52,11 @@ export class ContractNotifierService {
logLabel: string,
): Promise<void> {
this.logger.log(`${logLabel}${this.ref(c)}`);
const phone = c.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyPhone(this.dataSource, c.companyId)
: null;
const email = c.company?.email ?? c.company?.generalManagerEmail ?? null;
// One resolver for both channels — the company row's own email column is
// only set for a Fayda-verified owner (see companyNotifyEmailExpr).
const { phone, email } = c.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyContact(this.dataSource, c.companyId)
: { phone: null, email: null };
if (phone) {
try {

View File

@@ -51,8 +51,11 @@ export class EmailClientService implements OnApplicationBootstrap {
this.logger.log(
`EMAIL publish to RabbitMQ [${process.env.EMAIL_QUEUE ?? "email_queue"}] pattern='send-email' confirmed=${queued}`,
);
// Recipient + content are PII — debug only.
this.logger.debug(`EMAIL payload to=${dto.to} subject="${dto.subject}"`);
// Full content logged on purpose (audit of what actually left the API).
// Note: recipient + body are PII and land in plain application logs.
this.logger.log(
`EMAIL payload to=${dto.to} subject="${dto.subject}" text="${dto.text ?? ""}" html="${dto.html ?? ""}"`,
);
return { queued };
}

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ import { DataSource } from 'typeorm';
import { NotificationsService } from './notifications.service';
import {
companyNotifyEmailExpr,
companyNotifyPhoneExpr,
primaryContactUserJoin,
} from './resolve-company-phone.util';
@@ -19,7 +20,8 @@ export async function sendCompanyChannels(
): Promise<void> {
const [contact]: Array<{ phone: string | null; email: string | null }> =
await dataSource.query(
`SELECT ${companyNotifyPhoneExpr('co')} AS phone, co.email
`SELECT ${companyNotifyPhoneExpr('co')} AS phone,
${companyNotifyEmailExpr('co')} AS email
FROM freight.companies co
${primaryContactUserJoin('co')}
WHERE co.id = $1 AND co.deleted_at IS NULL`,

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
import { DataSource, EntityManager } from "typeorm";
/**
* Where a customer-facing SMS actually goes.
* Where a customer-facing SMS or email actually goes.
*
* The person who signs up, logs in, and receives OTPs is an IAM user, and
* `iam.users.phone_number` is the number they control and can change themselves
@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ import { DataSource, EntityManager } from "typeorm";
* `companies.contact_person_phone` is deliberately NOT consulted: the live write
* path stores that value in the `attributes` jsonb and has never populated the
* column, so every reader of it was silently falling through to `phone` anyway.
* `companies.general_manager_email` is the same trap on the email side — see
* {@link companyNotifyEmailExpr}.
*/
/**
* LEFT JOIN a company alias to its primary contact's IAM user, exposing
* `pc.phone_number`.
* `pc.phone_number` and `pc.email`.
*
* LATERAL + LIMIT 1 rather than a plain join: nothing in the schema stops a
* company having two `is_primary_contact` rows, and a plain join would then
@@ -28,7 +30,7 @@ import { DataSource, EntityManager } from "typeorm";
export function primaryContactUserJoin(alias: string): string {
return `
LEFT JOIN LATERAL (
SELECT u.phone_number
SELECT u.phone_number, u.email
FROM freight.external_profiles ep
JOIN iam.users u ON u.id = ep.user_id AND u.is_active = true
WHERE ep.company_id = ${alias}.id
@@ -44,17 +46,45 @@ export function companyNotifyPhoneExpr(alias: string): string {
return `COALESCE(pc.phone_number, ${alias}.phone)`;
}
/** The SMS number for one company, or null when neither source has one. */
export async function resolveCompanyNotifyPhone(
/**
* SQL expression for the company's notification address, given the joined `pc`
* alias.
*
* `companies.email` alone is not enough: it is written from ONE place — a
* Fayda-verified owner's email claim — so a foreign company, whose owner proves
* identity by passport instead, never gets one. Readers papered over that with
* `COALESCE(email, general_manager_email)`, but that column has the same problem
* `contact_person_phone` has above: onboarding writes the value into the
* `attributes` jsonb and nothing has ever populated the column, so the fallback
* could not fire and the mail was dropped in silence.
*
* So: the company address, then the two the customer actually filled in during
* onboarding, then the account that registered them — which always has one,
* signup requires it. `NULLIF` because a blank jsonb key is not an address and
* `COALESCE` would happily stop on it.
*/
export function companyNotifyEmailExpr(alias: string): string {
return `COALESCE(
NULLIF(${alias}.email, ''),
NULLIF(${alias}.attributes->>'generalManagerEmail', ''),
NULLIF(${alias}.attributes->>'contactPersonEmail', ''),
NULLIF(pc.email, '')
)`;
}
/** Both channels for one company; either side is null when nothing has one. */
export async function resolveCompanyNotifyContact(
db: DataSource | EntityManager,
companyId: string,
): Promise<string | null> {
const rows: Array<{ phone: string | null }> = await db.query(
`SELECT ${companyNotifyPhoneExpr("co")} AS phone
FROM freight.companies co
${primaryContactUserJoin("co")}
WHERE co.id = $1 AND co.deleted_at IS NULL`,
[companyId],
);
return rows[0]?.phone ?? null;
): Promise<{ phone: string | null; email: string | null }> {
const rows: Array<{ phone: string | null; email: string | null }> =
await db.query(
`SELECT ${companyNotifyPhoneExpr("co")} AS phone,
${companyNotifyEmailExpr("co")} AS email
FROM freight.companies co
${primaryContactUserJoin("co")}
WHERE co.id = $1 AND co.deleted_at IS NULL`,
[companyId],
);
return { phone: rows[0]?.phone ?? null, email: rows[0]?.email ?? null };
}

View File

@@ -52,8 +52,9 @@ export class SmsClientService implements OnApplicationBootstrap {
this.logger.log(
`SMS publish to RabbitMQ [${process.env.SMS_QUEUE ?? "sms_queue"}] pattern='send-sms' confirmed=${queued}`,
);
// Recipient + content are PII — debug only.
this.logger.debug(`SMS payload to=${dto.to} text="${dto.message}"`);
// Full content logged on purpose (audit of what actually left the API).
// Note: recipient + body are PII and land in plain application logs.
this.logger.log(`SMS payload to=${dto.to} text="${dto.message}"`);
return { queued };
}
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ export class SmsClientService implements OnApplicationBootstrap {
this.logger.log(
`BULK SMS publish to RabbitMQ [${process.env.SMS_QUEUE ?? "sms_queue"}] pattern='ozeking-bulk-sms' count=${messages.length} confirmed=${queued}`,
);
this.logger.debug(`BULK SMS payload messages=${JSON.stringify(messages)}`);
this.logger.log(`BULK SMS payload messages=${JSON.stringify(messages)}`);
return { queued };
}

View File

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import {
import { Booking } from '../bookings/entities/booking.entity';
import { NotificationsService } from '../notifications/notifications.service';
import { NotificationInboxService } from '../notification-inbox/notification-inbox.service';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyPhone } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { resolveCompanyNotifyContact } from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
import { TrainSchedulesRepository } from '../train-schedules/train-schedules.repository';
import { BATCH_TIMEZONE } from './booking-batch.constants';
@@ -65,10 +65,11 @@ export class BookingNotifierService {
logLabel: string,
): Promise<void> {
this.logger.log(`${logLabel}${this.ref(b)}`);
const phone = b.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyPhone(this.dataSource, b.companyId)
: null;
const email = b.company?.email ?? b.company?.generalManagerEmail ?? null;
// One resolver for both channels — the company row's own email column is
// only set for a Fayda-verified owner (see companyNotifyEmailExpr).
const { phone, email } = b.companyId
? await resolveCompanyNotifyContact(this.dataSource, b.companyId)
: { phone: null, email: null };
if (phone) {
try {

View File

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ import { TrainSchedulesRepository } from '../train-schedules/train-schedules.rep
import { NotificationsService } from '../notifications/notifications.service';
import { NotificationInboxService } from '../notification-inbox/notification-inbox.service';
import {
companyNotifyEmailExpr,
companyNotifyPhoneExpr,
primaryContactUserJoin,
} from '../notifications/resolve-company-phone.util';
@@ -649,7 +650,7 @@ export class BookingWindowService implements OnModuleInit {
`SELECT DISTINCT
c.company_id,
${companyNotifyPhoneExpr('co')} AS phone,
COALESCE(co.email, co.general_manager_email) AS email
${companyNotifyEmailExpr('co')} AS email
FROM freight.contract_routes cr
JOIN freight.contracts c
ON c.id = cr.contract_id
@@ -761,7 +762,7 @@ export class BookingWindowService implements OnModuleInit {
b.id AS "bookingId",
b.company_id AS "companyId",
${companyNotifyPhoneExpr('co')} AS phone,
COALESCE(co.email, co.general_manager_email) AS email,
${companyNotifyEmailExpr('co')} AS email,
COALESCE(oy.label, oy.code) || ' to ' ||
COALESCE(dy.label, dy.code) AS corridor
FROM freight.bookings b

View File

@@ -184,10 +184,20 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
// forms (plus a mandatory owner passport number).
const verifiedIdentity = identity?.faydaRequired === true;
// Which fields the current step renders an input for and therefore requires.
// Filled in further down (it depends on values this form owns), and read at
// validation time rather than at render time — the resolver below runs on
// events, always after the render that assigned it.
const requiredKeysRef = useRef<(keyof FormData)[]>([]);
const form = useForm<FormData>({
resolver: zodResolver(
buildOnboardingSchema(identity?.passportRequired === true),
),
resolver: (values, context, options) =>
zodResolver(
buildOnboardingSchema(
identity?.passportRequired === true,
requiredKeysRef.current,
),
)(values, context, options),
// `values` below re-seeds the form whenever the profile is refetched — and
// an in-page identity action (ticking "same as owner") refetches it. Without
// this, that reset silently throws away whatever the customer was part-way
@@ -432,15 +442,19 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
// Where the GM's details come from depends on how they were established: a
// Fayda verification (or a "same as owner" declaration) owns them outright,
// and only a company that may still type them falls back to form state.
// A verified GM's identity wins, but Fayda's email and phone claims are
// optional: what the verification did not supply is typed on this step, and
// the API deliberately does not read those back onto the identity (they are
// not proven), so the form value is the only place they exist.
const gmVerified = identity?.gm.verified ?? false;
const gmName = gmVerified
? (identity?.gm.name ?? "")
? firstPresent(identity?.gm.name, watch("generalManagerName"))
: watch("generalManagerName");
const gmEmail = gmVerified
? (identity?.gm.email ?? "")
? firstPresent(identity?.gm.email, watch("generalManagerEmail"))
: watch("generalManagerEmail");
const gmPhone = gmVerified
? (identity?.gm.phone ?? "")
? firstPresent(identity?.gm.phone, watch("generalManagerPhone"))
: watch("generalManagerPhone");
/**
@@ -448,9 +462,11 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
* "same as owner" declaration, or (only where Fayda is optional) by typing.
* Fayda is an Ethiopian national ID, so a foreign company's GM may hold none.
*/
// Matches what the API actually demands (`REQUIRED_COMPANY_INFO`): a name and
// a phone. The email is collected but optional — a manager proved through
// Fayda may have no email claim, and the notify resolver no longer needs one.
const gmTyped = Boolean(
watch("generalManagerName")?.trim() &&
watch("generalManagerEmail")?.trim() &&
watch("generalManagerPhone")?.trim(),
);
const gmEstablished =
@@ -623,12 +639,23 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
// delegated, so it's required the moment a PoA exists. The API enforces the
// same rule on save, so skipping it here only costs the customer a
// round-trip.
// A PoA exists exactly when one has been verified — the details are the
// verification's output, so there is nothing else that could stand for one.
// Until then the upload is hidden: there is no representative for the paper
// to authorise, and a freight forwarder is held on the verification gate
// below rather than on a file field it cannot yet fill.
const poaProvided = (identity?.poa.verified ?? false) || poaTyped;
//
// "Exists" is the API's own test (`POA_ATTRIBUTES.some(...)`): ANY detail,
// verified or typed. Requiring a complete typed representative here instead
// hid the upload from a customer who had entered only a name — for whom the
// API still demands the paper, and whose resume would then be clamped back to
// this step with nothing on it to fill.
const poaAnyDetail = [
identity?.poa.name,
identity?.poa.email,
identity?.poa.phone,
identity?.poa.address,
watch("poaName"),
watch("poaEmail"),
watch("poaPhone"),
watch("poaLocation"),
].some((v) => v?.trim());
const poaProvided = (identity?.poa.verified ?? false) || poaAnyDetail;
// A freight forwarder owes the paper whether or not its representative could
// verify with Fayda — the API demands it at completion either way. Keying
// this on the verification alone hid the upload from a foreign forwarder and
@@ -641,6 +668,60 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
return Array.isArray(v) ? v.length > 0 : v != null;
})();
/**
* What a Fayda verification did NOT supply, per person.
*
* Fayda's email, phone and address claims are optional and routinely come
* back empty, so a *verified* person can still be missing details the API
* demands (`REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS`, `REQUIRED_COMPANY_INFO`). Those gaps are
* typed instead — the API keeps exactly the keys a claim left empty typeable,
* since a claim that returned nothing owns no value to protect.
*
* Computed here, once, and handed to both the step (which renders an input
* per gap) and the schema (which requires exactly those) — a field is
* required if and only if there is an input on screen to fix it in.
*/
// Where Fayda is mandatory an unverified representative must verify rather
// than be typed, so nothing is offered until the verification lands.
const poaTypedAllowed =
!identity || identity.poa.verified || !identity.faydaRequired;
// A representative the verification never proved holds only typed details —
// the API leaves those unlocked, so the inputs stay on screen and stay
// editable. Only a *verified* PoA hides the fields their claim did fill,
// which is also the only case the API refuses to let anyone overwrite.
const poaGap = (v?: string | null) =>
poaTypedAllowed && (!identity?.poa.verified || !v?.trim());
const poaGaps = {
name: poaGap(identity?.poa.name),
email: poaGap(identity?.poa.email),
phone: poaGap(identity?.poa.phone),
address: poaGap(identity?.poa.address),
};
// The GM's own verification never falls back to the signed-in account — that
// account is the person onboarding, not necessarily the manager — so a GM
// verified with no email claim has nowhere else for one to come from.
// "Same as owner" is exempt: the API copies the owner's (account-backed)
// contact details across, so there is no gap and no input.
const gmGaps = {
email: !gmSameAsOwner && gmVerified && !identity?.gm.email?.trim(),
phone: !gmSameAsOwner && gmVerified && !identity?.gm.phone?.trim(),
};
const requiredKeys: (keyof FormData)[] = [];
if (step === "personnel") {
// The manager's email is offered but not demanded: the API dropped it from
// `REQUIRED_COMPANY_INFO` once the notify resolver stopped depending on it.
// The phone is still required there, so it is still required here.
if (gmGaps.phone) requiredKeys.push("generalManagerPhone");
} else if (step === "poa" && delegationRequired) {
// Only once a PoA is required or provided: an untouched optional PoA is
// still a step the customer may walk straight past.
if (poaGaps.name) requiredKeys.push("poaName");
if (poaGaps.email) requiredKeys.push("poaEmail");
if (poaGaps.phone) requiredKeys.push("poaPhone");
}
requiredKeysRef.current = requiredKeys;
/**
* Collect the messages for a set of fields into one sentence.
*
@@ -656,6 +737,7 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
// yet, so the closure would still be holding the previous attempt's state.
const parsed = buildOnboardingSchema(
identity?.passportRequired === true,
requiredKeys,
).safeParse(getValues());
const wanted = new Set<string>(fields as string[]);
const messages = parsed.success
@@ -875,6 +957,7 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
onToggleGmSameAsOwner={toggleGmSameAsOwner}
gmLinkPending={gmLinkPending}
gmVerified={gmVerified}
gaps={gmGaps}
/>
)}
@@ -892,6 +975,7 @@ export default function CompanyProfileForm({
form={form}
identity={identity}
requirePoa={requirePoa}
gaps={poaGaps}
delegationRequired={delegationRequired}
poaDocumentSetting={poaDocumentSetting}
documentFiles={documentFiles}

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { onboardingSchema, stepFields } from "./schema";
import { buildOnboardingSchema, onboardingSchema, stepFields } from "./schema";
import {
firstPresent,
firstValidEmail,
@@ -101,6 +101,56 @@ describe("stepFields", () => {
});
});
describe("buildOnboardingSchema (conditionally required fields)", () => {
const issuesFor = (
data: FormData,
required: (keyof FormData)[],
): (keyof FormData)[] => {
const parsed = buildOnboardingSchema(false, required).safeParse(data);
return parsed.success
? []
: (parsed.error.issues.map((i) => i.path[0]) as (keyof FormData)[]);
};
// Fayda's email/phone claims are optional: the step renders an input for what
// the verification did not supply, and requires exactly those. Nothing else —
// a field with no input on screen must never fail Continue.
it("requires only the keys it is handed", () => {
const issues = issuesFor(values(), [
"generalManagerEmail",
"generalManagerPhone",
]);
expect(issues).toEqual(["generalManagerEmail", "generalManagerPhone"]);
});
it("passes once those keys are filled", () => {
expect(
issuesFor(
values({
generalManagerEmail: "gm@example.com",
generalManagerPhone: "+251911223344",
}),
["generalManagerEmail", "generalManagerPhone"],
),
).toEqual([]);
});
it("leaves the same blank fields alone when nothing is required", () => {
expect(issuesFor(values(), [])).toEqual([]);
});
it("names the field in the message, so it reads under its own input", () => {
const parsed = buildOnboardingSchema(false, ["poaEmail"]).safeParse(
values(),
);
expect(parsed.success).toBe(false);
if (parsed.success) return;
expect(parsed.error.issues[0]?.message).toBe(
"Representative's email is required",
);
});
});
describe("stepPayload (company)", () => {
it("omits the eTrade bundle when nothing was re-verified", () => {
const payload = stepPayload("company", values(), {});

View File

@@ -105,27 +105,54 @@ export type FormData = z.infer<typeof onboardingSchema>;
export const POA_DELEGATION_FILE_KEY = "poa_delegation_letter";
/**
* The PoA's identifying fields are never typed — they come from the Fayda
* verification, whatever the company's nationality — so nothing here requires
* them. A freight forwarder's mandatory PoA is gated on the verification
* itself, and its delegation letter alongside it, both in CompanyProfileForm
* (files live outside form state).
* Labels for the fields a Fayda verification may or may not have supplied. Which
* of them are mandatory is decided per render (see `requiredKeys` below), so the
* message has to be built here rather than attached to the base schema.
*/
const CONDITIONAL_LABELS: Partial<Record<keyof FormData, string>> = {
poaName: "Representative's name",
poaEmail: "Representative's email",
poaPhone: "Representative's phone",
generalManagerName: "General manager's name",
generalManagerEmail: "General manager's email",
generalManagerPhone: "General manager's phone",
};
/**
* The PoA's and GM's identifying fields normally come from their Fayda
* verification, so nothing in the base schema requires them. But Fayda's email
* and phone claims are optional and routinely come back empty, and the steps
* render an input for whatever the verification did not supply — so those
* fields become mandatory exactly then.
*
* That leaves the owner's passport number as the only conditional field.
* `requiredKeys` is that decision, made by CompanyProfileForm from the same
* state that drives the rendering: a field is required iff an input exists for
* it. Passing it in (rather than deriving it here) is what keeps the two from
* drifting into a Continue button that fails on a field nobody can see.
*/
export function buildOnboardingSchema(
/** True for a foreign company: the owner's passport number is mandatory. */
passportRequired = false,
/** Fields the current step renders an input for and must not leave blank. */
requiredKeys: readonly (keyof FormData)[] = [],
) {
if (!passportRequired) return onboardingSchema;
if (!passportRequired && requiredKeys.length === 0) return onboardingSchema;
return onboardingSchema.superRefine((d, ctx) => {
if (!d.ownerPassportNumber?.trim()) {
if (passportRequired && !d.ownerPassportNumber?.trim()) {
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
path: ["ownerPassportNumber"],
message: "The owner's passport number is required",
});
}
for (const key of requiredKeys) {
if (d[key]?.trim()) continue;
ctx.addIssue({
code: z.ZodIssueCode.custom,
path: [key],
message: `${CONDITIONAL_LABELS[key] ?? key} is required`,
});
}
});
}

View File

@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ export interface PersonnelStepProps {
/** A server-side "same as owner" declaration is in flight. */
gmLinkPending: boolean;
gmVerified: boolean;
/**
* Which of the manager's contact details their Fayda verification did not
* supply, and are therefore typed here. Computed by CompanyProfileForm, which
* requires exactly these in the schema.
*/
gaps: { email: boolean; phone: boolean };
}
export default function PersonnelStep({
@@ -28,6 +34,7 @@ export default function PersonnelStep({
onToggleGmSameAsOwner,
gmLinkPending,
gmVerified,
gaps,
}: PersonnelStepProps) {
const {
register,
@@ -74,6 +81,34 @@ export default function PersonnelStep({
/>
)}
{/* Fayda's email and phone claims are optional, and the manager's own
verification has no account to fall back on the way the owner's does
— the person onboarding is not necessarily the manager. Whatever the
verification left empty is typed here, and required: without it the
submit fails on "Add your general manager email" with no field
anywhere to satisfy it. */}
{(gaps.email || gaps.phone) && (
<SimpleGrid cols={gaps.email && gaps.phone ? 2 : 1} spacing="md">
{gaps.email && (
<TextInput
label="Email"
type="email"
placeholder="gm@company.com"
error={errors.generalManagerEmail?.message}
{...register("generalManagerEmail")}
/>
)}
{gaps.phone && (
<ControlledPhoneField
control={control}
name="generalManagerPhone"
label="Phone"
required
/>
)}
</SimpleGrid>
)}
{/* Typed details survive only where Fayda cannot be required —
a foreign company's manager may hold no Fayda ID. Once
verified the API owns these fields, so they go away. */}

View File

@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ export interface PoaStepProps {
identity?: CompanyIdentityState;
/** This company holds a freight-forwarder profile, so the PoA is mandatory. */
requirePoa: boolean;
/**
* Which of the representative's details the Fayda verification did not
* supply, and are therefore typed here. Computed by CompanyProfileForm, which
* requires exactly these in the schema — so every input rendered below is one
* the customer is actually asked to fill.
*/
gaps: { name: boolean; email: boolean; phone: boolean; address: boolean };
/** The DARS delegation paper is owed (a PoA exists, or the company forwards). */
delegationRequired: boolean;
/** Single-field upload setting carrying just the delegation letter. */
@@ -28,6 +35,7 @@ export default function PoaStep({
form,
identity,
requirePoa,
gaps,
delegationRequired,
poaDocumentSetting,
documentFiles,
@@ -45,24 +53,21 @@ export default function PoaStep({
// empty, so a *verified* representative can still be missing the email and
// phone the API demands from a freight forwarder (`REQUIRED_POA_FIELDS`) —
// and the panel above renders no input for them, which dead-ends the step on
// "Add the poa email first". Offer an input for whatever the verification
// did not supply: the API keeps exactly those keys typeable, since a claim
// that returned nothing owns no value to protect (`faydaOwnedKeys`).
const poa = identity?.poa;
// Where Fayda is mandatory an unverified representative must verify rather
// than be typed, so nothing is offered until the verification lands.
const typedAllowed = !identity || poa!.verified || !identity.faydaRequired;
const missing = (value: string | null | undefined) =>
typedAllowed && !value?.trim();
const needsEmail = missing(poa?.email);
const needsPhone = missing(poa?.phone);
// "Add the poa email first". `gaps` is exactly what the verification did not
// supply: the API keeps those keys typeable, since a claim that returned
// nothing owns no value to protect (`faydaOwnedKeys`).
const needsEmail = gaps.email;
const needsPhone = gaps.phone;
return (
<>
<Text size="sm" c="edr-muted">
{requirePoa
? "As a freight forwarder you act on other companies' behalf, so Power of Attorney details and the DARS delegation paper are required."
: "Power of Attorney details are optional. Fill them in if you have them, or skip to continue. If you do enter a representative, upload the delegation paper authenticated by DARS."}
: "Power of Attorney details are optional. Fill them in if you have them, or skip to continue. If you do enter a representative, upload the delegation paper authenticated by DARS."}{" "}
{/* The API refuses an owner who delegates to themselves — say so here,
or the customer only finds out after being sent to Fayda and back. */}
The representative must be someone other than the company's owner.
</Text>
{/* A representative acts for the company inside Ethiopia
whoever owns it, so the PoA is proven with Fayda regardless of
@@ -78,7 +83,7 @@ export default function PoaStep({
)}
{/* Whatever the Fayda claim did carry is shown on the panel above and
is never typed here — the verification owns it. */}
{missing(poa?.name) && (
{gaps.name && (
<TextInput
label="Representative's Name"
placeholder="Abebe Bikila"
@@ -106,7 +111,7 @@ export default function PoaStep({
)}
</SimpleGrid>
)}
{missing(poa?.address) && (
{gaps.address && (
<TextInput
label="PoA Location"
placeholder="City, Country"

View File

@@ -127,9 +127,13 @@ export default function TabGeneralManager({ profile, mode = "edit", onContinue }
const mutation = useMutation({
mutationFn: (data: FormData) =>
api.companies.updateProfile.call({
generalManagerName: data.generalManagerName,
generalManagerEmail: data.generalManagerEmail,
generalManagerPhone: data.generalManagerPhone,
// `|| undefined`, never "": the DTO's `@IsOptional()` only skips null
// and undefined, so an empty string is validated and 400s with
// "generalManagerEmail must be an email". A verified manager legitimately
// leaves the fields Fayda did supply blank here.
generalManagerName: data.generalManagerName || undefined,
generalManagerEmail: data.generalManagerEmail || undefined,
generalManagerPhone: data.generalManagerPhone || undefined,
}),
onSuccess: () => {
queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: api.companies.getProfile.queryKey() });
@@ -144,6 +148,16 @@ export default function TabGeneralManager({ profile, mode = "edit", onContinue }
// posting empty strings over a proven identity.
const typedFieldsInUse = !gmSameAsOwner && !gm?.verified && !faydaRequired;
// Except for what the verification never supplied. Fayda's email and phone
// claims are optional, and a manager verified without them has no account to
// fall back on the way the owner does — so those stay typed, here as well as
// in onboarding, or a wrong address could never be corrected.
const gmGaps = {
email: !gmSameAsOwner && Boolean(gm?.verified) && !gm?.email?.trim(),
phone: !gmSameAsOwner && Boolean(gm?.verified) && !gm?.phone?.trim(),
};
const savable = typedFieldsInUse || gmGaps.email || gmGaps.phone;
return (
<Card padding="lg">
<Group gap="sm" mb="xs">
@@ -187,6 +201,34 @@ export default function TabGeneralManager({ profile, mode = "edit", onContinue }
/>
)}
{/* Whatever the verification did not supply is typed instead — the
API keeps exactly those keys writable. */}
{(gmGaps.email || gmGaps.phone) && (
<Grid>
{gmGaps.email && (
<Grid.Col span={gmGaps.phone ? 6 : 12}>
<TextInput
label="Email Address"
type="email"
placeholder="gm@company.com"
error={errors.generalManagerEmail?.message}
{...register("generalManagerEmail")}
/>
</Grid.Col>
)}
{gmGaps.phone && (
<Grid.Col span={gmGaps.email ? 6 : 12}>
<ControlledPhoneField
control={control}
name="generalManagerPhone"
label="Phone Number"
required
/>
</Grid.Col>
)}
</Grid>
)}
{/* Typed details survive only where Fayda cannot be required — a
foreign company's manager may hold no Fayda ID. Once verified the
API owns these fields and refuses edits, so they go away. */}
@@ -258,7 +300,7 @@ export default function TabGeneralManager({ profile, mode = "edit", onContinue }
empty strings at an identity the API owns and refuses to
overwrite. Onboarding still needs a way forward, so the button
becomes a plain Continue rather than disappearing. */}
{typedFieldsInUse ? (
{savable ? (
<Button
type="submit"
leftSection={<Save size={16} />}