Remove 'assign-reviewer' action and related functionality from license review process

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/components/DecisionConfirmModal.tsx

@@ -134,10 +134,7 @@ export function DecisionConfirmModal({
 
   if (!action) return null;
 
-  const needsOfficer =
-    action.id === 'assign' ||
-    action.id === 'assign-reviewer' ||
-    action.id === 'escalate';
+  const needsOfficer = action.id === 'assign' || action.id === 'escalate';
   const reasonMissing = action.requiresReason && !reason.trim() && !reasonCode;
   const blocked =
     reasonMissing ||

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/config/actions.ts

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ export type ActionTier =
 export type ActionId =
   | 'claim'
   | 'assign'
-  | 'assign-reviewer'
   | 'escalate'
   | 'hold'
   | 'resume'
@@ -69,18 +68,6 @@ export const ACTIONS: ActionDefinition[] = [
   // Claim is deliberately absent here: an officer claims from the queue
   // (LicenseQueuePage), not from this detail page. That implementation is
   // separate — see LicenseQueuePage/actions.tsx — and is unaffected by this.
-  {
-    // Starts the review under the push model: the team leader hands a freshly
-    // submitted (or eligibility-paid) file to an employee. Without it a CoC/CoP
-    // sitting in ELIGIBILITY_PAID had no action at all — the server offers only
-    // `claim` (a permission no seeded role holds) and this.
-    id: 'assign-reviewer',
-    tier: 'primary',
-    labelKey: 'review.actions.assignReviewer',
-    from: ['SUBMITTED', 'ELIGIBILITY_PAID'],
-    permissions: ['can:assign:license-application'],
-    emphasis: 'filled',
-  },
   {
     id: 'assign',
     tier: 'workflow',
@@ -168,7 +155,9 @@ export const ACTIONS: ActionDefinition[] = [
     id: 'final-approve',
     tier: 'primary',
     labelKey: 'review.actions.finalApprove',
-    from: ['INSPECTION_COMPLETED', 'UNDER_EVALUATION'],
+    // ELIGIBILITY_PAID: an examined certificate (CoC/CoP) is decided straight
+    // off the eligibility queue — no assignment step.
+    from: ['INSPECTION_COMPLETED', 'UNDER_EVALUATION', 'ELIGIBILITY_PAID'],
     permissions: ['can:approve:license-application'],
     emphasis: 'filled',
     color: 'teal',
@@ -178,7 +167,7 @@ export const ACTIONS: ActionDefinition[] = [
     id: 'request-adjustment',
     tier: 'primary',
     labelKey: 'review.actions.requestAdjustment',
-    from: ['UNDER_REVIEW', 'UNDER_EVALUATION', 'INSPECTION_COMPLETED'],
+    from: ['UNDER_REVIEW', 'UNDER_EVALUATION', 'INSPECTION_COMPLETED', 'ELIGIBILITY_PAID'],
     permissions: ['can:request-adjustment:license-application'],
     emphasis: 'light',
     color: 'orange',
@@ -193,6 +182,7 @@ export const ACTIONS: ActionDefinition[] = [
       'UNDER_EVALUATION',
       'INSPECTION_PENDING',
       'INSPECTION_COMPLETED',
+      'ELIGIBILITY_PAID',
     ],
     permissions: ['can:reject:license-application'],
     emphasis: 'light',
@@ -315,7 +305,6 @@ export interface ResolveContext {
 const WORKFLOW_EVENT_IDS = new Set<ActionId>([
   'claim',
   'assign',
-  'assign-reviewer',
   'escalate',
   'hold',
   'resume',
@@ -390,13 +379,9 @@ export function resolveActions(ctx: ResolveContext): ResolvedAction[] {
         disabledReason: reason,
       });
 
-      // Decisions belong to whoever holds the application. Assigning a
-      // reviewer is the team leader handing work out, so it is exempt — the
-      // leader is by definition not the officer who will hold it.
+      // Decisions belong to whoever holds the application.
       const needsOwnership =
-        action.tier === 'primary' &&
-        action.id !== 'confirm-payment' &&
-        action.id !== 'assign-reviewer';
+        action.tier === 'primary' && action.id !== 'confirm-payment';
       if (
         needsOwnership &&
         app.assignedOfficerId &&

apps/backoffice/src/app/features/license-review/pages/LicenseReviewPage/index.tsx

@@ -39,7 +39,6 @@ import {
   useLocalized,
   useApproveDocumentsMutation,
   useAssignApplicationMutation,
-  useAssignReviewerMutation,
   useClaimApplicationMutation,
   useCompleteReviewMutation,
   useConfirmPaymentMutation,
@@ -218,7 +217,6 @@ export function LicenseReviewPage() {
   const [resumeApplication] = useResumeApplicationMutation();
   const [escalateApplication] = useEscalateApplicationMutation();
   const [assignApplication] = useAssignApplicationMutation();
-  const [assignReviewer] = useAssignReviewerMutation();
   // Real officer list, so Assign and Escalate name a person instead of
   // silently reassigning to whoever already held the application.
   const { data: officers = [] } = useGetAssignableOfficersQuery();
@@ -672,18 +670,6 @@ export function LicenseReviewPage() {
             t("review.done.escalate", "Escalated"),
           );
           break;
-        case "assign-reviewer":
-          if (!submission.officerId) return;
-          await run(
-            () =>
-              assignReviewer({
-                id,
-                officerId: submission.officerId as string,
-                remark: submission.reason,
-              }).unwrap(),
-            t("review.done.assignReviewer", "Review assigned"),
-          );
-          break;
         case "assign":
           if (!submission.officerId) return;
           await run(