End-to-end testing of the direct truck-to-train flow surfaced two defects
in the carriage acceptance sheet's no-wagon fallback. Container numbers
were read from freight.containers, which only gains rows at allocation,
so a direct booking's declared containers never appeared; they are read
from booking_container_units now, seal numbers included. The weight used
bulkTotalWeightTons alone, which is null for CONTAINER and PER_TON bulk
bookings, printing 0.00 — cargoTotalWeightVgm is the real weight there
and only holds an item count for PER_ITEM break-bulk.
Separately, warehouse cargo can be loaded from the Load-to-Train queue or
from the schedule, but loading from the schedule never advanced
warehouse_inventory. The booking went IN_TRANSIT while its cargo still
read as sitting in the warehouse — the same inconsistency that produced
the spurious dispatch block. loadBooking now moves the inventory to
LOADED in the same transaction, and no-ops for direct bookings.
Export cargo reaches a train two ways, but the platform only modelled
one. Direct truck-to-train cargo loads straight onto the wagon, never
enters a warehouse and so never has a GRN — yet assertExportReceivedWithGrn
required one before the carriage acceptance sheet could be issued or the
booking loaded from inside its schedule.
Adds export_handover_mode to freight.bookings (null = WAREHOUSE, so
existing bookings are unaffected) and teaches the shared gate to skip
DIRECT_TO_TRAIN. Both call sites are fixed by that single early return.
For direct bookings the carriage acceptance sheet builds its lines from
the booking's own containers, falling back to the declared bulk tonnage,
and is issuable as soon as the mode is chosen. Direct bookings are also
removed from the warehouse receive queue, since that cargo is never
coming to the shed.
Staff choose the mode from the booking detail page via a new endpoint
reusing bookings:operations. Switching to direct is refused once
warehouse inventory exists, so the two flows cannot cross.
Warehouse-then-train keeps every gate it had.
Now that every fleet-resource page and settings page has its own
dedicated permission key (previous commit), the broad fallbacks are
redundant and over-grant: anyone holding only fleet:view/fleet:manage
or admin could reach every page in that whole section, not just one.
Removed fleet.view fallback from: Routes, Locomotives, Train Builder,
Wagons, Containers, Cargoes, Compliance & Alerts, Procurement, and the
Overview dashboard's Fleet KPI tab.
Removed fleet.manage fallback from: canFleetAction() (per-resource
fleet CRUD, lib/permissions.ts) and TrainBuilderDetailPage's wagon-
assignment check. Hard-delete already had no such fallback.
Removed admin fallback from: File settings, Dropdown settings,
Contract templates, Portal content, Trade access, Exchange rate.
Left untouched: Incidents (sole gate is fleet.view — no dedicated
edr_freight_app:incidents:* key exists on the backend yet, so there's
nothing to fall back FROM; removing it would make the page
super-admin-only).
Access-narrowing change: anyone currently relying on the coarse grant
without also holding the specific resource/settings key will lose
access to these pages until roles are updated to grant the specific
keys directly. Audit role assignments before this deploys.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The export-only assertAllocatedCargoLoaded guard threw a
BadRequestException whenever a booking on the schedule had warehouse
inventory in RECEIVED, STORED or READY_FOR_LOADING, making it
impossible to dispatch a train whose cargo had not been inspected and
loaded onto a wagon.
Leaving cargo behind is an operational decision, not an error state.
The dispatch confirm dialog already lists unassigned and unloaded
bookings and offers Dispatch anyway, so the readiness signal is
preserved — only the hard block is gone.
Wagon/locomotive conflicts and the Djibouti gatepass check still block
dispatch: those are physical and legal conflicts, not cargo readiness.
